Voting legal age?

Question

Should you be able to vote for laws at legal age?

Obviously nobody knows all the law anymore

people break obscure laws every minute

usually without ever knowing

do we always need to be criminals of one type or another

by antiquated laws of foolish ones that get broken by the majority the majority of the time.

Should we be able to vote for current laws or continue to uphold laws that are maintained but ignored not known or enforced.

Couldn't we be more law abiding if we knew more of the laws and there were less but more meaningful ones to know.

If we voted for laws they would reflect our current national regional local situations the antiquated or major population criminalizers might not be so valid decades after they were created.

If only 10% feel a law should exist, should it
if 75/25 do should it
if 50/50
if 90 % ?

Discard review uphold add according to the people governed by the laws for the people.

multiparameter question/comment tabulation

Answer 1

People rarely vote on laws, only constitutional amendments.

The age of 18 is old enough to learn to vote for representatives who will write laws, especially since many 18 year olds pay taxes.

Answer 2

The legal voting age should be raised to 21.... that would offset some of the lure of the Left to voters.... give them a chance to experience a little REAL life before they start voting.

Yes, there should be less laws... and they should make sense. Outdated laws that no longer apply to our society nowadays should be removed from the books.

10%: NO, unless it can be shown that there is a solid and valid reason for the law, the same for any result under 50%

Over 50%, but under 75%: there would be a reason that would need evaluating, but again, it should require solid ground before being enacted.

75%: Yes, as long as it is not stepping on the rights of individuals

90%: YES

Now, I wonder why ILLEGAL ALIENS are still allowed to invade the USA and why they are not being deported.... with all haste possible.

Answer 3

Laws are enacted by representatives of the governing agency - Federal, State, County, City, Municipality ect. Voters elect these representatives who are supposed to keep the laws current and to remove any outdated or unjust laws which should no longer apply. Removing a law from the books by a popular vote is not feasible, but bringing the need to remove a law can be conveyed to your representative easily enough. Petitions for legislative action works great if enough people sign it, especially during an election campaign.

As for the legal age to vote - 18 is my answer. 18 year olds are regarded as adults in criminal courts, required to register for the draft (even tho there is no draft), and can sign a legal and binding contract. Therefore they should have the right to decide who's going to represent them in government.

FYI - I live in Thailand, and the voting laws here are quite different than they are elsewhere. In Thailand, registered voters are required by law to vote in every election. If they fail to do so they lose the right to vote for the next 5 years.

Answer 4

I think the position I will take on your question/comment is that a pure democracy does not exist in America because it is too cumbersome. We have a representative democracy so that a few people can deal with our laws instead of having every action bogged down in a general election. We are expected to trust our representatives to do what we want them to do, to truly represent us in their deliberations and decisions. If we don't like their decisions, then we vote for another representative. Consider what it would take for all Americans to vote on every action that our congress now handles. If we thought that Congress was slow to make decisions, I guarantee that a general discussion and vote would be much worse. Yes, with modern communication technologies, we could get information out to the people much better now than when our country was founded. If every citizen took the responsibility to read and learn what the issues are, to think about them and how they would apply to our lives, then maybe we could have and electronic ballot for every major legislative action. In such a case, then a majority vote would probably be the deciding amount.
The key is to have a truly informed populace and that takes individual effort to read and learn and think about the laws being presented. We don't do a very good job of that right now.

Answer 5

Taking a perfect away could be an extremely risky factor to do. as quickly as something is taken away it hardly is decrease back. An occasion could be the eating age which replace into 18 for fairly some years and now that's 21 and in in the present day's climate possibilities of it returning to 18 are few if any in any respect. we predict human beings to be held to binding contracts at age 18, and we empower human beings to serve interior the army at that age asking them to settle for each duty that is going with that provider, which contain battling in a conflict. We additionally in a time of emergency require human beings to settle for being drafted at age 18. My factor is, if as a society we know human beings to be adults at 18 and abide by skill of person regulations then we could desire to continuously preserve their perfect to vote. the surprising thing with regard to the vote is that that's a call and not voting is a valid selection despite if many human beings disagree with that selection.

Answer 6

The reason we have the type of laws you object to is because people will not vote and when the few do vote they put into place people who want obscure, vague, laws so they can commit crimes and get by with it.

Answer 7

I think it works out. I have never been pulled over/stopped/arrested for a law I didn't know existed. The same goes for everyone I know. Seems to be working...

Answer 8

NO