my opinion is that every country paricipating plays any country...lets say the qualifyier is 20 games...you'll play those 20 games against different nations...not just in your geographic area. and the best 32 teams...or 31 (with the host nation) qualify.
good points: more talent is recognized, everyone gains expierience, the WORLD cup will be that exactly...WORLD CUP!
bad points: germany will rip american samoa 100-zip. or any strong country....
and 30 european countris will qualify and brazil and argentina.
what are your thoughts about this?
2006-10-02 05:17:12 · 12 answers · asked by Naty:Co-Emperor Has Returned 6 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
No, coz then the under-dogs like the African/ Asian countries will always be dominated by Europe and South America. If there's only Europeon countries playing against Brasil and Argentina, that's not really a WORLD cup. lol I think it's fine the way it is. Although US has it too easy. They need some serious competition, big time.
2006-10-02 05:27:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Couple issues 1st. Mexico is extra corrupt particularly even as their own president offered the votes to win the election second. Why mexico? i imagine it could be extra perfect in any united states that hasnt hosted it two times alredy third. Brazil undesirable? I dont imagine so in the different case they wouldnt have received the bid for 2014 4th. What makes you imagine mexico will win wc at homestead in the journey that they cant even beat jamaica at homestead throughout a qualifier? And very last. even as did mexico win of a rest room (except for adolescents communities) im particularly particular that would want to be not in any respect. No offense in elementary words cuz you thumb me down doesnt recommend im incorrect its all authentic
2016-12-04 03:25:27 · answer #2 · answered by mehaffey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with Thizzz on this one Naty.
If other Nations/Continents didn't get the opportunity to play then how would it really be the WC. How would they get any exposure or the experience to learn and develop their game. If it stayed with only European/Sth American teams being involved it would damage the progress in keeping the game truly global.
2006-10-02 10:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I see your point, but would be disappointed if teams out of the African continent, for example, would not have the opportunity to display their exuberance.
2006-10-02 05:21:22 · answer #4 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree for the fact that Scotland never qualifies, maybe they would at least have a chance:-( :-(
2006-10-02 05:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the competition should include a swimsuit portion, but I'm old fashioned.
2006-10-02 05:19:57 · answer #6 · answered by Master_of_my_own_domain 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think they should have a head butting contest at the end of each game referred by Zidan to sort out the men from the boys (Italians)
2006-10-02 05:25:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
there will not be diversity in the World Cup
2006-10-02 05:20:23 · answer #8 · answered by Arts 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree with THIZZ..but you have a wonderful idea there,very creative..
2006-10-02 13:38:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have to second THIZZZ's answer.
2006-10-02 07:07:12 · answer #10 · answered by At Last WC2010 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋