"...you're a terrorist." George Bush's words on the War on Terror. Given that intelligence experts in the US and UK are now both saying that the War in Iraq is actually helping to RECRUIT terrorists, are we now within our rights to legally define Bush and Blair as terrorists, and if so, how do we go about ensuring regime change in their terrorist states?
2006-10-02 04:05:54 · 6 answers · asked by mdfalco71 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
In response to the above answerer - if speaking out against the government is "giving comfort to the terrorists" and this is illegal, does this mean I have no right to free speech?
Also, tangentially, if the terrorists are fighting us because they hate our freedoms, and we give up our freedoms to fight the terrorists, do the terrorist win?
And to the asker, the problem with your logic is that Bush, et. al. have not directly given money or support to the terrorists. By your logic, buying oil/oil products give support to the terrorists, which means that every time I fill up my car (which gets good gas mileage- 27 actual 32 advertised mpg) I could be arrested because some of that money could wind up in terrorists' hands.
What Bush and friends have done in Iraq is wrong, you don't need to use straw man arguements to make that point.
2006-10-02 04:21:47 · answer #1 · answered by John J 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I have been a generous donor of a feed, clothe and house a terrorist charitable organization. Sally Struthers(of All in the Family) is the spokesperson for it. You may have seen the commercials late at night on the celebrity cooking cable station.A terrorist is someone else's freedom fighter. During the Soviet/Afghan war, we supported the mujadeen who did unspeakable acts against humanity when the Soviets fell into their hands. The Soviets called them terrorists. We called them friends, allies and freedom fighters. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Terrorist is a nebulous term. It is in the eye of the beholder.
2006-10-02 19:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are regularly scheduled elections in both places that ensure regime change will happen with time. As for them being terrorist states, Id love for you to say that in person, you need to be taught a lesson when you are hiding scared and anonymous behind a computer.
2006-10-02 11:15:44 · answer #3 · answered by bmwdriver11 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How about the more straightforward question about what other administrations should have been called after they equipped various Middle Eastern countries with munitions in order to sic them on other countries only to go back on their word and call the people WE TRAINED and SUPPLIED terrorists.
God Freakin Bless America, right?
2006-10-02 18:23:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel I will not give something to which the was name of terrorist, because which I see most terrorists only giving just ruination. and in my religion [of] islam may not break that is a very big sin.
2006-10-02 11:15:19 · answer #5 · answered by trianty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok
2006-10-02 11:13:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋