English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

2006-10-02 05:38:01 · answer #1 · answered by miniboi6666 2 · 3 2

The person who said its for profit is a true hero. The reality was circumsion genital mutulation of boys was done in the late 1890s because the doctor John Harvey Kellogg wanted to prevent masturbation of boys and make our sex lives less pleasurable. He also wanted the pain and trauma of circumsion the clamping of the penis and crushing of the foreskin to be Soo traumatic that it would affect us psychology in our sex lives as adults. He is a sexual pervert and a religios wacko. Now it's done for money. Every circumsion genital mutulation of boys done in us makes the hospitals approximately 600 US dollars. What's more disgusting is in the United states there is a federal law prohibiting circumsion of females but not males. It's about time we rise above the medical community and leave males intact with foreskin just as God or nature intended. Also over 200 male baby boys die a year to this unnecessary barbaric procedure.

2015-02-20 21:02:46 · answer #2 · answered by laeott 1 · 0 0

I had read or heard that men that had been circumsised feel more pleasure - I have no idea if its true or not - I prefer the look of a circumsised penis but thats just personal taste - however in saying that if I were to ever have a son I wouldnt have him circumsised as I wouldnt want to put my son through such unneccessary pain.

2006-10-02 03:50:12 · answer #3 · answered by ♥Kazz♥ 6 · 3 0

I think you will find there is very little difference in sensation from the mans point of view. An erect penis will automatically have the foreskin pulled back, rather like the bud of a flower opening and the petals opening out

2006-10-02 04:11:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It feels better for the man...as A. you have a skin to protect the head..this makes it way more sensitive when its out of the skin and erect.

2006-10-02 03:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by Quintus T 3 · 1 0

iv heard a man thats been circumcised is better in bed but i dont no if its true

2006-10-02 03:46:24 · answer #6 · answered by angel 36 6 · 2 1

i prefer someone whos not circumcised so much more fun

2006-10-02 04:36:49 · answer #7 · answered by Helen D 3 · 3 0

The guy has more sensitivity and, trust me on this one, this makes him more adventurous in bed. He will want to try all sorts of positions quite frequently because the sensation is sooooo much better.

2006-10-02 04:34:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It really does not matter. For BJ both taste the same.

2006-10-02 03:49:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think it would keep them from some feeling, I don't think I would want to do it with a man who hasn't been circumsized.

2006-10-02 03:48:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers