i would like to know what technology offers more storage and less cost, and what would be better for the future.
2006-10-02 03:42:41 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Other - Hardware
They are really all using same underlying EEPROM technology, just form-factor is different.
SD has too many variants but they all follow the same adapter circuitry.
SM is dead-ended.
Memory Stick/Pro: never liked them, and by the same token never liked Sony if they keep produce their own technology for themselves.
CF: big; but they are simpler and likely to bounce back for PDAs. Although they are cheaper to implement and will be the bleeding-edge type.
So SD and CF are winners.
2006-10-02 04:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by Andy T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I base my decision on the usefullness of the card. I use SD because I can use them in my camera, my handheld, and my computer interchangeably. The cost per mb seems similar for all.
2006-10-02 03:47:26 · answer #2 · answered by Interested Dude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all cards are of same technology...CF is the most cost effective but not very popular in point-and-shoot cameras...usage wise, SD card is the best since it has fairly good price and wide usability
2006-10-04 01:20:04 · answer #3 · answered by Vinod Billakoorti 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SD - Secure Digital is faster then MMS and have a switcher to protect your data. I choose SD.
2006-10-02 03:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋