2006-10-02 03:17:03 · 8 answers · asked by lelee 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe that If I need a drug test to get a job, then they should also. I also believe that before a person can run for a political office they not only need to be drug tested, but they need to have a full psychological profile done on them to make sure they are mentally stable enough to hold this type of job. and that they are not bigots. (what ever test that would be) And a lie detector test, to see what they are really in it for.
Oh what a dream, but don't you agree we would be a lot better off......
2006-10-02 05:39:49 · answer #1 · answered by Joy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
<---------- Former City Council Member.... I would have been willing to take that test.
Why stop there though? Perhaps we should just test everyone on a yearly basis. Then tatoo the results of those tests right on their foreheads using ink that lasts for a year at a time.
2006-10-02 03:33:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. A recent study found no increase in employee production or safety since drug testing was introduced. The study concluded the only winner in drug testing is the drug testing companies.
Sorry I don't know the source.
2006-10-02 03:20:58 · answer #3 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope, he's the optimal in the chain of command,,who's he going to respond to,, people who oftentimes smoke pot, and desire to legalize it in the Nevada election this week??? or ,, ok, the "ethical majority",, lmao.. it is a humorous/stupid question, and it is thank you to long, and not real, different government workers, those working DFAS, civil servants are not examined. you have at a loss for words too many matters, one in all drug finding out, that may deliver approximately privateness matters, and different systems of discussions, which exist already, and your assumption that one and all government workers, have morals, and could be examined, and that conserving the presidential seat is worth purely to a demigod, who doesnt' reveal humanisitic character flaws.. you easily condone drug use, (you probably did not have any conviction against it)??? so seems you will possibly enable it the two way, as long as he outted himself,, which we already understand he has achieved, so did Clinton, soooo,, what's the component? in the event that they'd conceal up Foley, (dems and Republicans) whats a convention song of blow between friends??? LMAO!!!
2016-10-18 08:36:44 · answer #4 · answered by goodknight 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For which drugs? Alcoholism seems to be the largest problem. That and crack if you represent DC.
2006-10-02 03:19:01 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
definitely!
But at the Prez level, his cronies will cover up unfavorable results (no matter which party's in power)
2006-10-02 03:19:13 · answer #6 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
do you think that politicans really use drugs. They dont, you cant be a successful politican and use drugs. Even though i am a republican, i dont think democrats use drugs either.
2006-10-02 03:20:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Oh, and pedophilia tested, too! ;)
2006-10-02 03:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by dane 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋