did neil armstrong really was the 1st to land on moon?

Answer 1

no, the first one was the spaceship, then twas armstrong

Answer 2

Neil Alden Armstrong (born August 5, 1930) is a former American astronaut, test pilot, and Naval Aviator who is widely known for being the first human ever to set foot on the Moon. Armstrong's first space flight was as command pilot of Gemini 8 in 1966. On this mission, he performed the first manned docking of two spacecraft together with pilot David Scott. Armstrong's second and last space flight was as mission commander of the Apollo 11 moon landing on July 20, 1969. On this famous "giant leap for mankind", Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin descended to the lunar surface and spent 2.5 hours exploring, while Michael Collins orbited above.

Before becoming an astronaut, he had served as an aviator in the United States Navy, seeing action in the Korean War. Following this he became a test pilot at the NACA High-Speed Flight Station, now known as the Dryden Flight Research Center, where he flew over 900 flights in a variety of aircraft. As a research pilot, Armstrong served as project pilot on the F-100 Super Sabre A and C aircraft, F-101 Voodoo, and the Lockheed F-104A Starfighter. He also flew the Bell X-1B, Bell X-5, North American X-15, F-105 Thunderchief, F-106 Delta Dart, B-47 Stratojet, KC-135 Stratotanker and Paresev.

duh!...its very easy!!...

Answer 3

a radio officer at NASA disclosed the following after 35 years of the moon landings. he said that Neil Armstrong radioed that he saw something unusual.according to that officer Neil Armstrong said(looking towards the horizon) "somebody is watching us". And apparently Neil Armstrong later told NASA officials that he saw some kind of spacecraft that he had never seen.the officer refused to be named. SO I THINK IT WILL BE SAFE TO SAY THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS "THE FIRST HUMAN TO LAND ON THE MOON".

Answer 4

Niel Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin both landed on the moon simultaneously, Neil was the first man to SET FOOT on the moon.

Answer 5

a million) Earth exists, in simple terms through ways. it may reflect elementary onto the moon. 2) The shadows are going to be black. there is not any air to scatter the elementary. lots of the photos seem full of elementary because the digital camera develop into pointed on the point of the solar. bypass take a image of the solar a even as and also you may see what I recommend. 3) that's suitable. There aren't any stars. The cameras used through the Apollo missions had to take a short publicity to work out the exterior. If the publicity develop into lengthy adequate to work out the celebs, the exterior of the moon might want to look very brilliant, and there would not be a purpose in taking the image. 4) that's said as the solar. Are you truly using this as an arguement?, lol. 5) The Apollo missions left behind gadgets with which to study lunar seismology. in addition they had cameras on them. 6) it quite is inaccurate. If the movie might want to soften on the lunar floor, then why no longer in orbit. they're both reecieving a similar amout of image voltaic skill... 7) even as the LM fires, some dirt does bypass out, yet as you communicate about, no longer almost as a lot as you would possibly want to imagine. the reason dirt blows out plenty right here on earth is because air currents carry it farther. on the moon, there is not any air, so the in elementary words dirt that's going to be moved is the dirt promptly laid low with the engine burn. 8) again, no air signifies that dirt does no longer have a fashion in which it could be carried as some distance. 9) Swirling dirt eh? no longer going to ensue if there is not any air. 10) apparently, your 10th arguement left. Copied and pasted did we? 11) The flags are not waving in a manor that would want to be consistent with wind. even as the flags look to "wave", that's because of momentum move from shifting the flag. except for your fourth arguement, it quite is amazingly laughable, your factors are very good and that i visit work out how they can make someone believe the lunar landings were fake. One ought to keep in mind that the moon is an exceedingly diverse position than right here on earth, and so as that comparisons won't be able to be made between both with actuality (the air impacts on dirt as an social gathering). Cheers ^_^

Answer 6

No. But he was the first person. The first thing to land on the moon is a space probe. Neil Amstrong was the first person followed by Buzz Alardin. You can still see the American flag and the footprints left by them and other astronauts.

Answer 7

Yes

Answer 8

Yeah, Neil did it. & to all who believe it was faked, you denigrate the complex & dangerous achievements of your fellow citizens. I suspect a large part of your disbelief of thousands of Americans that took part in that near miraculous event lies in your total belief that you, yourselves have no ability to do marvelous tasks. & to save yourselves from a total inferiority complex, you must think that all other humans do not have the ability to fulfill magnificent accomplishments.

Answer 9

yes the people say it although there are roumors that his partner did it 1st and let him take the credit. I cant be sure as i did not personally see what actually happened

Answer 10

yes,he was the first human who land on moon.

Answer 11

yeah, the first to set foot on Moon, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin was the next.