2006-10-01 23:00:25 · 9 answers · asked by Analyst 7 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Why not.
I say, if someone is really tired of life or sick
— like having cancer — why shouldn't he move !
Please watch that old Fleischer-movie "Soilent Green"...
Edward G. Robinson has a choice and he visits
a "special clinic" to "commit suicide" (I hate that word,
in German we say "Freitod" — means
"to take the freedom to die"... )
2006-10-01 23:16:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but society doesn't really have a say, it's up to the person who is commiting suicide if they will go through with it or not.
2006-10-03 08:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by Kelly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. If a person does not have the exclusive right to determine whether or not they want to live then we are like other peoples property. To live we have the indignity of following all kinds of rules for the greater good. At least we could be allowed the dignity of the final choice regarding our own lives.
I have great respect for people with the strength of character which must be required to make this irrevocable decision.
2006-10-02 01:27:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i think in some cases....it should be allowed...suicidal tendencies are not always in "psychos"
it depends on the reason for the same.....sometimes....
people suffering from pain-full diseases use the method of "ending their life" (medical term used - "Euthanasia") . their doc's help them in this and in past few years....it was practiced quite often for particular cases. i don't know about present but during that times...it was banned because of many protests.
their may be other reasons for a suicide....but it is considered very unethical. but a person has to live with himself most of the times...and not with the society.....so i guess if he feels like it....he should go forward with it....provided no one is harmed with his act of suicide
2006-10-01 23:48:29 · answer #4 · answered by mj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm 15 ( sixteen in a million day) and properly.. i think distinctly a lot comparable to you, i do no longer smoke pot or something yet i'm getting extremely disillusioned with myself and hate myself a lot. no longer a large form of buddies the two. i think of roughly it a lot, yet then i think of of the solid issues in existence. you have no longer have been given a foul family members who beats you, or people who extremely hate you. there is not any reason to commit suicide. attempt to be better, perhaps you will get greater buddies. in case you think of you're truthfully going to do it, promise me you will call helpline, or now bypass to the drs to get a referral to a psychiatrist ( they help a lot, been going to physiologists for panic assaults, stress and self-well worth subjects besides as a pair of issues because of the fact I have been 7) solid success, remember suicide isn't the respond.
2016-12-26 07:14:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I live here in Or. where it is legal (kinda I guess) have not followed it to close lately..but There are lots of people that are sick who wanna check out, and were coming here. I think Or. laws are changing because we don't wanna be known as suicide state. Do you know who Dr. Kevorkian is?
2006-10-01 23:47:38 · answer #6 · answered by mr.longshot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are not taking into account the permanent impact on the family of the suicide victim. they have to live with it for the rest of their lives.
2006-10-01 23:32:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
of coz no.it is stupid and there r many ppl who r sick tht is struggling to live and why wanna take ppl lives away if we r given a precious life of our own......
2006-10-01 23:30:50 · answer #8 · answered by ~electra~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unfortunately, there is no "let" in this equation, suicidal people don't bother to get "permission" to kill themselves.
2006-10-01 23:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋