I dont understand the last part of this question?

Question

the part of the question that i dont understand
What generalizations can you make about the circumstances under which regulation is, or is not, warranted?

what is the question trying to ask in the last part?

==================
Some Obervers support government regulation of business, while others oppose it. Briefly identify the major arguments for and against government regulation of business. Drawing on examples of government regulation we have studied (e.g., regulation of prescription medicines and food safety, regulation the mergers, regulation of business political contributions), do you support government regulation of business, or not? What generalizations can you make about the circumstances under which regulation is, or is not, warranted?

Answer 1

what conclusions can you draw about the situations in which regulation is or isn't neccessary

Answer 2

a generalization means a widely-based conclusion or remark. so the question is asking you to give a general opinon on the situations or events where regulation by the government is needed,or not needed.

Answer 3

what general idea can u give about the situations under which regulations were imposed and the situations under which regulations were not imposed.

Answer 4

Simply put,
Generally, in what situations are regulations unnecessary?

Answer 5

It means:
What general rules say whether regulation is needed or not.

So, regulation is needed when these things are true...

Regulation not needed when these things are true...

Answer 6

i think its like...

what is something you can say about the condition of the law under government control or are the laws not allowed.


hope it helps