and obviously you love the LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL area, hmmm accept yourself! you will be happy! lol =D
2006-10-01 20:08:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by antoni_m 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Geoge won not because of the gay issue but several factors.
Gay is like anything else; there will always be a percent of the population that is handicapped, geniuses, gay, etc.
You need to realize that for you to imagine being with another guy - that same feeling of 'wrong' is how gay people feel when they imagine themselves with the opposite gender.
Unfortuanately, Bush rode on the Republican vote which tends to associate religion with things that have no religious bias.
I hope you are as cute as your pic because you are really, really, uneducated. Make a gay friend, you might be surprised on what you might learn. Better yet, make friends with a handicapped or highly intelligent person since I'm sure you know none of the three.
2006-10-01 20:09:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by happy g 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
This country is ruled by the majority, but it also protects minorities, including gays. The answer to your question is the same as when working women without families are told their lifestyle is wrong, they cry "male chauvinist pig". You tell anyone they are wrong, and they will say that what you are saying is wrong.
You can't say that all people who voted for Bush are against gay marriage. It doesn't matter anyway. Having a marriage that conveys benefits to man-woman marriages but not to other types of marriages is discriminatory, and such a marriage needs to be taken off the law books, not codified in constitutions.
I call on Virginians in particular to vote NO on the Defense of Marriage Amendment on November 7. Not only will this codify in the Constitution this discrimination against gay people, but it will also take rights away from straight unmarried couples.
2006-10-03 15:46:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by alnitaka 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
that's a intense concern, and extremely deep and sophisticated to understand. It does no longer make it any a lot less complicated even as the individuals laid low with it receive the harsh and ignorant clinical care from us. in element of actuality - even with the actuality that - that the in elementary words challenge chastized through the scriptures and God Himself is the act of sex between adult males (humorous, yet i do no longer keep in mind the escriptures pointing out some thing about women individuals. Why, i do no longer understand). that's both chastized the relationship it quite is outdoors of marriage even no matter if that's between 2 consenting adults, i believe because it recognize no longer the Holy corporation of marriage, that God Himself created, even as He suggested the guy will leave his moms and dads and take his spouse and bothe turns into one flesh. Paul declared that those that lust themselves - adult males with adult males - doing what that's unatural, will receive God's wrath. this may no longer be the case lower than celibate circumstances, and that is ,for sure a similar for thjose who're heterosexuals yet aren't any further married. So, fornication (that undesirable note!!!) applies bothfor hetero and homosexuals aswell. I personnally believe that there are - a minimum of - a coiuple of diverse situations of homosexuals: there exists those which have hormonal complications (or a spinoff of that, psicological nature) and those that in simple terms tried it ...an like it. For an over hormonal case and for a heterosexual over testosteroned male the concern with God is an same. The gay individual must have a similar restraint because the heterosexual one in thfact that neither has a eco-friendly elementary to bypass round having sex. previous that i visit't argue extra, because it could be as judging, and that i visit't do this. It should be not elementary, because our society is wrotten now and each and every thing is valid and "well-known"...S&M, Animal enthusiasts, Fetiches (earlier said as "deviations") which consists of Golden showers, Defecation, and so on...the list is gigantic, yet all of them have a similar common denominator: excitement. the challenge turns into after we like excitement more suitable than we do God.
2016-12-04 03:07:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by samrov 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because Bush cheated to win the election, doesn't mean half the country is against us. Get a life, and perhaps some real facts.
2006-10-04 14:48:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Agent Double EL 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
FYI, less than 30% of the people support him now. sorry.
and yes, telling someone that the way they live is disgusting and wrong does make you intolerant and in the case of homosexuals, a homophobe. what harm does their sexuality do to you?
2006-10-01 20:11:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Psyche 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is a difference between lifestyle and being queer you know. A lifestyle is a choice. You cannot choose to be queer. While I agree certain lifestyles are not suited to me personally, I do not go out of my way to put people down for their choices. As for being queer, I do not care if you are or not. It is how you handle the issue that really matters.
2006-10-01 20:09:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by sangheilizim 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush is my MonkeyBoy. He won with barely 51%. You're just dumb all the way around it would seem.
2006-10-01 21:43:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Come back to bed, baby. Daddy needs some lovin.
2006-10-03 05:44:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by pceej 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll have to agree that "Many people are against them, but afraid to speak up." Straight people can't be honest anymore. It seems that I can't disagree with someone that goes against God's plan for mankind. Gays can't accept they're wrong, but I believe that deep inside they know it. Deep inside they meet with God and they sh!t their panties and cry like babies.
2006-10-03 10:54:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by R.C.P. 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yeah well I think that your just jealous cuz I get more pussy than you ever will in you whole lifetime
2006-10-02 14:13:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by kiayakbo13 1
·
0⤊
0⤋