Are NeoCons.. bent on world dominance ? Do they have the ability to take over if they decide it's time?

Question

how much would it take to declare marshall law and get all the 30percenters out there to Goose step in line ?

Answer 1

Well, neo-conservatism is of course a political philosophy that developed directly from Wilsonianism.

In fact, many neo-conservatives are / were of course former Democrats, who felt that the Peace movement had betrayed their surpreme ethical value: that every human deserved political freedom.

Ideologically, pure neo-conservatism is not, of course, bent on world-domination. The right of every people to self-governance is a fundamental premise to the neo-conservative argument. The idea, a descendant from Woodrow Wilson, is that true democratic countries simply do not go to war against each other (in fact, many political science professors will play a game: name two democratically elected nations who have fought a war together and you automatically get an A in the course).

Thus, spreading democracy leads to peace. The key difference between Neo-conservatives and their American liberal counterparts is of course the question of force. We have all heard the expression "Going to war for peace is like having sex for virginity." This is the liberal argument. In fairness to the Neo-Conservatives, they might be able to reply that any peace that does exist currently existed because someone went to war. For example, the reason that England is not a group of petty kings and tribes fighting amongst each other is that one became poweful enough to stop them from doing it.

The more legitimate question, I think, is how closely are people claiming to be Neo-Conservative following the basic ideals of the movement? Could someone use these ideas to justify war-mongering? Absolutely.

I hope that this answer at least opens some minds to the fact that Neo-Conservatism is not exactly the evil political philosophy that it gets portrayed as being.

Answer 2

Media and song being relationship love and drama obsessed, human beings over stumble on their problems with this style of song, is someone extremely shifting on at the same time as their listening to song about their subject matters? contained in the 80's and ninety's song became about playing life and living the instantaneous, now majority of it really is the different and song has a large effect on human beings and cultures.

Answer 3

Seriously they can only go as far as the Church went,It will be very hard to control non christian countries as you have already seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.Church also tried in Holy land but failed in the old days too.The difficulty lies in understanding of cultures and their behaviors and their values.and NeoCons have non of those Qualities they are bent on dominance and are only really interested in economic gains like PIRATES

Answer 4

Bush, the father, has this organization - PNAC - I don't know
very much about it, except that it's his plan for the neo-cons to
dominate.
I think it's just PNAC.com - if I remember right, it was easy
to get to.

Answer 5

Seth, that is one of the most intelligent answers I have seen on this forum in a long time.

Answer 6

Sorry, liberalism is bent on world dominance. Just look at the pressure the UN and EU are trying to put on the rest of the world to be like them.

Answer 7

Hardartsy that is the most retarded question I've seen in a long time.

Answer 8

It would be the best thing for the world if we WERE in charge!

But we are not hell bent on doing it.

Answer 9

im trying to understand the logic of this question

Answer 10

"Marshall" is spelled Marshal and I dont see your point.... Did you have one?