English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Would anyone be willing to to have restrictions on thier freedom for security reasons. YES but not limitless restrictions.Nor can you keep adding to these restrictions indefinitely.Otherwise the govt.will censor the print and electronic media.When this happens you are no longer a democracy.The USA is no longer a bastion of freedom.Rather the opposite

2006-10-01 18:00:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

absolutely not! heres why: I have lived through the Korean war, the Bay of Pigs, the Soviet union attempting to install nuclear weapons on Cuba, the assassination of a president, served in the U.S. Air Force on aS.A.C. base where we had 8 B-52s loaded with nuclear weapons on continuous alert and B-52s participating in Operation Chrome Dome, served one year in Vietnam, lived through the gas shortage of 73-74, Watergate and the resignation of a president,was in Detroit the morning before the riots broke out in 67, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, Somalia, Bosnia, panama, Grenada, the first Gulf war, the first bombing of the WTC and the second attack on the WTC, and on and on and on and on. Nobody talked about giving up or taking away our freedom then. Why should we do it now. I don't feel any more or less in peril now than I have at any other time in my life.

2006-10-01 20:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by bonobo 2 · 0 0

http://www.presidentialquarters.com/

2006-10-01 17:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers