English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-01 16:33:11 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

5 answers

NASA originally planned to do a maintenance mission in 2005, but the destruction of the shuttle Columbia put the spaceflight schedule in disarray. In addition, the former administrator of NASA stated that the shuttle needs to be able to reach the ISS in case an emergency develops. The shuttle can't reach both Hubble and the ISS in the same mission, so the project was shelved.

The new adminstrator took over in 2005, and looked into performing either manned or robotic repair missions again. Eventually, it was realized that a robotic mission was unfeasible, and set a tentative date of April 17, 2008 for the flight, named STS-125, using the shuttle Discovery.

Even if this mission is not performed, a replacement for the Hubble, the James Webb Space Telescope, is scheduled to go into operation in 2013, and is supposed to be equal, if not superior in several aspects. Hubble will not reenter the atmosphere until sometime between 2010 and 2030, depending on solar activity.

A final sidenote: before the destruction of Columbia, it was initially planned for Hubble to be retrieved by the Shuttle in 2009 and returned to Earth for placement in a museum. However, the new safety standards, combined with the cost of a shuttle mission (around $500M), cancelled this plan.

2006-10-02 15:46:01 · answer #1 · answered by ndcardinal3 2 · 1 0

simply by fact we don't have something in area to interchange it on the 2d. Hubble keeps on doing helpful technological know-how, and we desire it up there. far greater scientists desire to apply it than have the prospect - we can't arise with the money for to loose it if we are able to restore it. The James Webb area Telescope continues to be a minimum of four years down the line.

2016-12-12 18:49:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they aren't sure yet. they are still tying to figure out what happened and if it can be fixed.

2006-10-01 17:52:09 · answer #3 · answered by biggie 5 · 0 0

They fixed it already, some years ago.

2006-10-01 17:14:11 · answer #4 · answered by Helmut 7 · 0 1

It isn't broken.

2006-10-01 17:06:32 · answer #5 · answered by · 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers