Do think people should show I.d. or proof of citizenship to vote?

Question

in the USA

Answer 1

YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES

I can't believe that we don't. It is one of the most stupid things I can think of. But, some politicians say that it is unfair to the poor, elderly, etc.

WELL, then let's offer free government ID cards for people that don't have their own driver's license.

There is so much room for fraud w/o having to show proof of who you are.

Ah, don't me started. argh!

Answer 2

Yes and so does 80% of Americans. Democrats are against this because they want illegals to vote, along with others who should not be voting. There is no logical reason to stand against this. The Democrats talk about voter fraud, yet they are the guilty ones. The WA governors race was stolen. Dino Rossi won 2 counts. Miracleously, there were some votes found in Seattle county and the Democrats won. It did not matter that there were more votes cast in the county than registered voters.

Answer 3

Yes. Democrats are dead wrong to suggest that voters should not show ID. I'm actually quite surprised when I vote (here in New York State) that I'm not asked to show ID. Anyone can impersonate me and vote on my behalf.

An ID is not a burden for anyone to carry around. For something as important as voting, I think we can at least do the minimum and verify one's identity.

To put it in perspective, we ask for ID to get into clubs and bars. Shouldn't voting be given that same scrutiny?

Answer 4

Aug. 15, 2006 | Eva Steele has a son in the military who is supposed to be fighting for freedom in Iraq, but sitting in a wheelchair in her room in a Mesa, Ariz., assisted-living facility, she wonders why it's so hard for her to realize a basic freedom back here in America: the right to vote.

Arriving in Arizona in January from Kansas City, weakened by four heart attacks and degenerative disk disease, Steele, 57, discovered that without a birth certificate she can't register to vote. Under a draconian new Arizona law that supposedly targets illegal immigrants, she needs proof of citizenship and a state-issued driver's license or photo I.D. to register. But her van and purse were stolen in the first few weeks after she moved to Mesa, and with her disability checks going to rent and medicine, she can't afford the $15 needed to get her birth certificate from Missouri. Her wheelchair makes it hard for her to navigate the bus routes or the bureaucratic maze required to argue with state bureaucrats. She's unable to overcome the hurdles thrown in her way -- and in the way of as many as 500,000 other Arizona residents -- by the state's Republican politicians.

"I think everybody should have the right to vote, no matter if you've got two nickels or you're a millionaire," Steele says. "I think it's a shame you have to jump through so many hoops to prove that you're the person who you say you are."

But Steele's plight has gotten relatively little notice from pundits and progressive activists confidently predicting a sweeping Democratic victory in November. Opinion polls show that a majority of the public wants a Democratic Congress, but whether potential voters -- black and Latino voters in particular -- will be able to make their voices heard on Election Day is not assured. Across the country, they will have to contend with Republican-sponsored schemes to limit voting. In a series of laws passed since the 2004 elections, Republican legislators and officials have come up with measures to suppress the turnout of traditional Democratic voting blocs. This fall the favored GOP techniques are new photo I.D. laws, the criminalizing of voter registration drives, and database purges that have disqualified up to 40 percent of newly registered voters from voting in such jurisdictions as Los Angeles County.

Answer 5

it is not discrimination to show an identity in line with se - the priority arises simply by fact that's fantastically much impossible for the poor to GET identity records. case in point, Georgia at present handed a regulation asserting that as a fashion to vote, you had to recent a driving force's license or equivalent state-issued identity. concern is, there is not any longer a single driving force's license place of work everywhere in Atlanta. no longer one. the closest one is in Decatur, it extremely is a 2-hourpersistent by skill of motor vehicle, and a 4-hour bus journey. So it might placed an undue burden on the poor without automobiles (who'd could desire to take an entire ruin day of artwork, in the event that they have jobs) to bypass to the closest license place of work by skill of bus. additionally, as a fashion to get an identity, you could desire to have a beginning certificates now. in case you like a beginning certificates, you could desire to call the needed records place of work of anyplace you have been born. yet once you do not have a telephone or get right of entry to to the internet, that's fantastically much impossible to discover the numbers for those workplaces. so which you will desire to discover a thank you to get that record, then you definately could desire to take a ruin day of artwork to bypass to a pair place of work in an out of hte way region to get an identity record. very final word: as a fashion to get an identity, you could desire to pay a value. If a value is had to get an identity required to vote, then a value is had to vote. that's a poll tax, and that's unconstitutional. The a procedures greater desirable thank you to do issues is with provisional ballots: You vote, and your vote is marked as provisional. So election officers verify the call of the voter to the voter rolls of registered voters in that precinct. If the call fits, the vote counts. If it would not, it would not. And ANY election worker can require ANY voter to record a provisional poll. it is not like that's all that no longer hassle-free, and it would not placed an undue burden on states simply by fact they have been doing provisional ballots for one hundred years, so it is not something new.

Answer 6

Yes,you need I.D. to check into a motel,get on a plane,cash a check, etc.. It should be mandatory to show I.D. to be able to cast a vote.

Answer 7

A good percentage of Democrats votes are fraudulent.
A good percentage of Democrat votes are by illegals.
There's no way the Democrat Party will ever allow id's to be shown; or proof of citizenship.
They would lose millions of votes.

Answer 8

Yes.
It is fabled that in Chicago the dead vote twice!

And before you say that that was way back when, look at recent elections when college students in Wis bragged that they voted several times in the last Pres election!

Answer 9

You bet and all who vote should get the purple finger to so they cant vote more than once.
Where I grew up the joke was "Vote early and often".More people voted from the cemetery than you could imagine

Answer 10

We have to shoiw an ID to board a plane or check into a motel - why not at the voting booth? I think we should.