Had he committed enough money and troops to Iraq to begin with, then we would not have this unfortunate current situation. All of the generals asked for them, but he refused to give them. Why is it so difficult to listen to the people with expertise? I especially expected better military support from a Republican.
2006-10-01 16:03:28 · 10 answers · asked by I am all that is man 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Max: I guarantee I could do better. There's just one small problem, I can't get appointed. I'm 20 years old and have no connections to this administration. I don't have any idea what goes on? This may be true, but I guarantee I'm more informed than you are. Also, what book are you talking about? If you're trying to make a coherent argument then at least finish what you're trying to say.
2006-10-01 16:43:10 · update #1
I agree.
Runsfeld had a great battle plan, but no plan for peace. That was the problem of the Iraq war.
2006-10-01 16:05:07 · answer #1 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He's not incompetent, if you think you could do better I fully encourage you to try. Anyway, you really dont have much of an idea of what actually goes on in the white house so just shut off. As soon as youre proven wrong when you read this book that came out maybe you can come in here and tell everyone youre not "political" anymore.
2006-10-01 23:12:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rumsfeld did listen to some generals.
Maybe he listened to the wrong ones.
AND MAYBE NOT.
Only a few retired generals came out to criticize Rummy, they didn't do it while they were in power.
They may be playing politics.
2006-10-01 23:08:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Better question is why hasn't Bush dumped him?
Shows the whole administration is incompetent.
2006-10-01 23:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by powhound 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because he never served in the military?
He's just been winging this war, obviously.
2006-10-01 23:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by Calee 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
he would have to admit to himself that he has failed. like thats every going to happen! must be a repug defect!
2006-10-01 23:07:17 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to make Bush look a little less supid
2006-10-01 23:05:01 · answer #7 · answered by j918101080 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because he was appointed by "W"
2006-10-01 23:05:11 · answer #8 · answered by Import Beer Man 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
he's keeping the heat off of bush, and your proving it.
2006-10-01 23:04:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
too much wacking off
2006-10-01 23:04:16 · answer #10 · answered by Max K 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋