I'm cut
2006-10-01 15:53:33 · 14 answers · asked by Greg S 3 in Health ➔ Men's Health
I am cut and I agree with Mike... it is cleaner
2006-10-01 17:14:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm uncut, and I'd rather stay that way. I can choose to use lube if I want but I never have to. I don't think it'd feel quite as good without a foreskin, just the mechanics of it is different. And I've never had any cleanliness issues. Smegma hasn't been an issue since I knew I could wash under the foreskin. Never had any other problems with it, so why change it? It's not like it's hard to maintain.
2006-10-02 00:49:09 · answer #2 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know you wanted this to be answered by a guy...... But you dont always get what you want....
My son is cut, I prefer my man to be cut. Looks nicer and is definetly more cleaner.
To dispell some rumours about cut ones......
In studies around the world it was found that -
In the UK of 150 men circumsised ... 38% reported improved penile sensation.
In the USA of 125 men ... improved satisfaction at the 96% certainty level.
In China of 95 men ... prolonged intercourse in 31 cases and improved satisfaction in 34 cases
In a study of 42 Turkish men circumcised for religious reasons, Senkul found no significant effect other than a 60% increase in time to ejaculation at the 98% statistical confidence level. Senkul suggested that delayed ejaculation may in fact be seen as a benefit.
A multinational study by Waldinger et al found that circumcised men took on average 6.7 minutes to ejaculate, compared with 6.0 minutes for uncircumcised men..
Bleustein tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, and found no difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men, confirming an earlier study by Masters and Johnson. Bleustein later followed up with a larger study, with the same finding.These studies relied on laboratory tests of sensation thresholds to mechanical or thermal stimuli, rather than on subjective reports of sexual sensation.
So dont let them scare you into thinking you wont feel a thing if you have it done.
2006-10-02 00:33:52 · answer #3 · answered by wickedly_funny66 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
uncut definately. I am uncut and let me tell you masturbation in itself is so much better cause I dont have to use any lubricants or anything. also uncut peniss are just more sensitive because they still have all the sensory cell tissue so blowjobs and sex are that much more better.
2006-10-02 00:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by minimark501 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Uncut, better for masturbation and it is more sensitive being uncut.
2006-10-01 23:04:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm uncut so i don't know how it feels to be cut. if you mean preference for sexual activity, you should ask the ladies and the gay guys who dig and enjoy men's penis. i hope i answered your question. cheers!
2006-10-01 23:09:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cut or uncut is it important?
2006-10-02 05:57:43 · answer #7 · answered by dani ng 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you meaning your public hair.
Not cut. A guys public hair plays an important role in his health. It actually helps to prevent bacteria infections to the penis. Shaving it is pain and could also cause many major disease.
2006-10-02 04:58:31 · answer #8 · answered by koko 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am definetely cut!
Uncut are disgusting!
2006-10-02 02:53:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cut is better for the male and female. I had all my sons clipped.
2006-10-03 13:33:55 · answer #10 · answered by gina t 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My boyfriend says cut - he did it when he was 16 and says it is so much better.
2006-10-01 23:06:05 · answer #11 · answered by Kaytee 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋