English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How do they get away with not accepting any responsibilities?

2006-10-01 14:51:10 · 22 answers · asked by Iloveitwhenyoucallmebigpoppa 2 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Rember the world trade center? It got bombed? No, not the one in NY I'm talking about "The Oklahoma City bombing" who was President then?... Oh, yea I rember!

"Bill Clinton!"

Weeks later, bin Laden's attack's the U.S.S. Cole! Who was President then? Oh yea!

"Bill Clinton"

1998-Bombing of the U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000.

Bill Clinton

Who sold the Panama Canal?

Bill Clinton

The way I see Bush has done a much better job so far then Bill. If you are to say that Bush is to blam for 9/11 then you have to blam everyone that came before him.

This is not a new! It's just Bush wants to do something about where everyone before him did nothing.

2006-10-01 15:27:50 · answer #1 · answered by hdchackz 5 · 2 0

Bill Clinton had 8 years. And Mr. Bush has accepted responsibility for his mistakes. The Clinton administration did not leave any comprehensive plan behind either. Bill Clinton said he did, but we all know for sure he is liar! Just ask Luenski and Jones. They can tell you! And ask the Middle Easterners, they will tell you that Al Qaeda has been decimated! By...oh yeah that guy from Texas. Mr. Bush! And by a whole lot of kids that would follow him to hell if asked to. You see, they are there and see what really is happening. Spread all the lies ytou want, they will not believe you either! I am tired of having to stick up for good people because know nothings are spreading lies about them.

2006-10-01 22:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 4 1

I remember that. I also remember that clinton had eight years in office and didn't do sh*t either. There were six attacks during his administration and he never did anything but lob a few missles at some make-shift Taliban training camps. There was only one attack during Bush's term and he had the good sense to go to war over it. Five years later there hasn't been another attack on our soil and thousands of terrorists and their sympathisers have been killed. Even more will be killed before this is all over. The more the merrier!

Your Bush bashing is getting old. I suggest you find yourself another demon to blame for your pathetic life you dumb, liberal piece of sh*t!

2006-10-02 00:28:45 · answer #3 · answered by caesar x 3 · 1 0

do you remember that bill clinton had 8 years in office and didn't stop al qaida. how do they get away without accepting any responsibilities?

2006-10-01 22:44:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Do you remember that Bill Clinton had 8 YEARS in office before that, and several opportunities to get OBL and did not. Talk about trying to get away with accepting responsibilities.

2006-10-01 21:55:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Clinton had 8 years.

2006-10-01 22:02:53 · answer #6 · answered by eferrell01 7 · 4 1

Yup...stop Al Qaeda from doing the 9/11 attacks when they have no clue it is going to take place. We need psychic politicians.

2006-10-01 21:53:54 · answer #7 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2 3

did you spell responsibility by yourself? Idiot clinton had 8 yrs and all he got was a bj and a lousy Tee shirt.

2006-10-01 22:12:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Bush was too busy taking vacations. What makes you think that they wanted to stop 9/11 from happening, anyhow?

2006-10-01 22:10:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Remember that clinton had 8 years?

2006-10-01 21:54:08 · answer #10 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers