2006-10-01 14:49:03 · 10 answers · asked by nakita 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Comics & Animation
I think it was foolish, unwise just short of suicidally stupid. A lot of his former friends have already turned against him, like Jonah Jameson did instantly when he realized how Parker had been laughing at him behind his back all those years. And he has now exposed his loved ones-- Mary Jane and Aunt May-- to the attacks of every super villain who's ever wanted to take revenge.
Sure they can stay safe as long as they stay inside Stark's headquarters. But who wants to live like a prisoner...? Eventually, SOMEbody will get one or the other of them, in revenge. And then Peter will realize his awful mistake. But it will be too late. It would be just like Marvel to 'update' things by giving him a brand new reason to fight crime.
Having the guilt of Uncle Ben's death isn't enough, oh, no. Now he has to have the guilt of Aunt May and his wife's death, too. You just watch and see. See if I'm not right.
2006-10-01 16:57:15 · answer #1 · answered by cdf-rom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Superheroes should never reveal their identitiy. I know that a writer had some kind of mental brain fart, or was pushed too hard by the marketers, but to do so now ruins the character of ever having the chance to be a "real" person again.
Shame on them.
2006-10-01 21:58:17 · answer #2 · answered by rouschkateer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It required a pivotal character to set the pace. Spiderman is well none for protecting his family and identity plus believing in "With great power comes great responsibility" Peace.
2006-10-01 22:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by wildrover 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it was a horrible idea.
Part of the allure of Spider-Man is that he's always dodging those finding out his secret-- working for JJ as Peter while JJ hates him as Spider-Man. I have read a few of the post-532 comics and it's just not the same. :(
2006-10-01 22:38:41 · answer #4 · answered by Pajama L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a huge change in the nature of the character. All kinds of options have been added to a story that's a little long in the tooth.
Yes, Good
2006-10-01 21:58:14 · answer #5 · answered by HendryDoso 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was an incredibly mentally challenged decision and i don't agree with it and it was cruel of Stark to put petey in such a moral corner. Give him a place to stay, new costume, new gadgets and then make him reveal his true identity. That's why i ain't reading civil war.
2006-10-01 21:55:43 · answer #6 · answered by Totoru 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its wise in the context that comics are fluid, meaning that down the road if they dont like what they did they can change it. If it sells books cool if not there are multiple ways they can fix it( jean grey, colossus, hawkeye, the vision).
2006-10-01 22:01:43 · answer #7 · answered by C-Nice44 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep, that was wrong, it goes against to whole secret super hero thingy
2006-10-01 22:04:15 · answer #8 · answered by mørbidsшεεŧnεss 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
we already knew it so it wasnt a big mystery, it was just kinda of a thing to keep you interested.
2006-10-01 21:56:48 · answer #9 · answered by houseman2012 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i that have issue...i think they made him take off his mask cause they were losing money for comices books but its just my though
2006-10-01 21:58:13 · answer #10 · answered by silentksnake 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋