2006-10-01 14:48:48 · 16 answers · asked by Iloveitwhenyoucallmebigpoppa 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To much destruction to little success + the fact that it is the single act that would see the world unite against America.
2006-10-01 14:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by kel 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you have a brain? Or any bit of common sense in your skull? Using an atom bomb would obliterate a city causing injury and death to millions of civilians and leaving harmful radioactive waste in its blast zone for years to come. Terrorists hide among civilians for a reason you know. Think before you speak, if you think at all.
2006-10-01 21:52:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
lets see hiroshima + a bomb= death of millions of innocents
Bush + 5 a bombs( everythings bigger in texas) to iraq= death to middle east and then nuclear world war from China, korea, oh russia was hiding some in the closet and we blow up the whole planet and we all die. Sounds like a good idea.
2006-10-01 22:17:46 · answer #3 · answered by soccerplayer007me 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drop a nuke? You libs and Bush-bashers go nuts about a car bombing that kills civilians! And we didn't even set the dang thing off! The only way that would ever happen is if somebody sets one off here first. Yeah, great question.
2006-10-01 21:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Using the atomic bomb would prove that we are no better than the terrorists.
What good is saving the country, if we become the very thing we originally set out to destroy?
2006-10-01 21:55:39 · answer #5 · answered by Captain Moe 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The EXACT same way you guys say Clinton was Tough when all he used was the BJ bomb that he Dropped on AMerica when he didn't have sexual relations with that woman.
2006-10-01 21:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
ya lets use the atom bomb and start a nuclear war.. thats real smart....however there is some truth to your question. he isnt being that tough.
2006-10-01 21:51:42 · answer #7 · answered by Julie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That in this case Iam afraid would create more problems than it would solve but.......It stopped Japan dead in their tracks and look where they are today, In 50 years from now we might just be buying the worlds best made cars and TV's made in Iraq.
2006-10-01 21:58:51 · answer #8 · answered by CUSTODIAN JOE 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Becuase the 'A-bomb' would also cause something called a 'fallout' which would harm more than just terroists.
2006-10-01 21:51:41 · answer #9 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because the A-bomb is so pansy, if anything, he should use the H-bomb
I am serious
2006-10-01 21:51:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋