Aren't mid term elections just a referendum on the White House?
2006-10-01 14:46:23 · 20 answers · asked by Iloveitwhenyoucallmebigpoppa 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He should be indicted and put in prison. Guantanamo preferably
2006-10-01 14:58:22 · answer #1 · answered by Georgi Girl 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If mid term elections are just a referendum on the White House then may I inquire whether you suggested that Bill Clinton resign when the Democrats lost not only the House but also the Senate? Somehow I think that bit of logic escapes you. Or perhaps logic is over your head.
And what if the Republicans retain both the House and the Senate?
2006-10-01 22:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by barrettins 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don’t you just guts like lancelot?
They control all three branches of government?
The single largest provider of political information for most Americans is FOX NEWS, who openly advocate the conservative position.
The administration is the most secretive in the history of the country, in a clear effort to keep the American people in the dark as much as possible.
And yet, they whine about being cheated and misunderstood when the fact is that the truth is their enemy.
Your question:
As someone else said, that would just leave us with Beelzebub in the Oval Office.
Also, like an alcoholic, I think the Republicans should be allowed to hit bottom first. Otherwise they will blame all their failures on the Democrats and they (the DEMS) don’t seem to be able to stand up for themselves against the repub attack dogs.
**************************
wildthing -
That could be for the best. America works best when its government works least. And, its government works least when we have political gridlock. Except when there is a President like Clinton who can make the country great in spite of the opposition parties best efforts to sandbag him.
America is almost always at its worst when one party controls the ex and leg branches.
2006-10-01 21:59:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Democrats will not gain anything significant from the coming elections, if anything at all. The next president will also be a republican and the right wing revolution will continue!
2006-10-02 00:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by caesar x 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't recall President Clinton resigning when the House was lost during his Presidency......or any other President for that matter.
2006-10-01 22:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When the going gets tough, the tough get going. ***-U-Me. Your assuming that the Republicans are going to lose the House majority makes an a** out of you and me. Comprendo?
2006-10-01 22:02:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
One thing is certain - he won't get any of his pet legislation passed which means all the perks will dry up for all his buddies. He may as well resign because he'll be dead in the water.
2006-10-01 22:02:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did Clinton, you moron? Keep dreaming about losing the majority in the House!
2006-10-01 21:49:33 · answer #8 · answered by AMERICA #1 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why? it doesnt matter, it'll keep checks and balances in place if the republicans lose the house....but its a neck in neck race right now, lets see what Jerry Springer , oh, I mean, The parties campaign ads.....
2006-10-01 21:49:16 · answer #9 · answered by Isthisforreal 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You need to keep in mind that if Bush resigned we would get Cheney. Who do you really think would be worse?
2006-10-01 21:59:08 · answer #10 · answered by KL 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That in itself is not enough reason to resign but he should anyway before he totally and I mean totally screws up the country and before any more of our brave troops in Iraq are slaughtered.........
2006-10-01 21:52:44 · answer #11 · answered by CUSTODIAN JOE 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋