English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does our enviroment out way our genectic pragmming...

2006-10-01 14:27:21 · 12 answers · asked by coopchic 5 in Social Science Other - Social Science

12 answers

Great question! Thanks for making me think...you are delaying the onset of my Alzheimer's (is that genetic?)

I have to add my 2¢ to this discussion though I probably have no new insights. It's the old nature/nurture argument, though recent research seems to lean more toward the nature side. From conception on, we seem to be hard-wired for certain general and specific behaviors. We now know that the male and female brains are different from birth and that many of the stereotypes (e.g. women as collaborators, men as competitors) have a basis in our DNA. We know that predispositions for disorders like schizophrenia, addiction and alcoholism are inherited. Sociopaths seem to be born, not made.

This kind of thinking could lead us down a slippery slope, where no one is responsible for his aberrant behaviors, were it not for free will. We CAN make choices, and perhaps this is where environment plays the most important role. Children who have dysfunctional role models may be unable to make healthy choices, but if better choices are modeled and taught intensively, those individuals are capable of change. We may be programmed in certain directions, but we have the ability to go into the hard drive and re-write the code.

2006-10-01 16:12:51 · answer #1 · answered by keepsondancing 5 · 1 0

the obvious answer can vary. as we can all make our own choices. however, if its a psychology question, from what i remember in the book its 50% genes 50% environmental. they get this through various research and stuff. most scientologists will deny it and call it fake but, there's a reason people do inherit certain behaviors and other things from parents. its all about survival. the parents that behave in a safe manner will tend to survive, and so do their offspring, those who dont may end up out of the gene pool.

2006-10-01 14:38:37 · answer #2 · answered by wightbringer 2 · 2 0

I think that its our genes AND the enviroment. there've been studies that have proven with alcoholism that a child born to 2 alcoholics raised in a setting where there ARE NO alcoholics in the enviroment, the child has a 90% chance of becomming an alcoholic. im one of them. my father was an extreme hardcore alcoholic but i was raised by my mother and stepfather both of whom drank on occasion and rarely if ever got drunk. i still became an alcoholic, in so far as enviroment goes.. genetically, none of my immediate family members can cook worth beans ( sorry mom....) so when my mother started working harder my brother and i had to start cooking dinners... and i became a pretty good cook. and once i moved out i -HAD- to cook for myself. so even more practice. i cook for my bf every night, and heh ive still got him so i must be doing somethign right .. my enviroment forced me to learn how to cook.. and cook well... my genetics enabled me to become an alcoholic

2006-10-01 14:42:49 · answer #3 · answered by ariadne_kaitu 2 · 1 0

I think genes are everything....my son has never really known his father...it is AMAZING how much like his father he is...my son is 28 now...he even likes the same foods as his father...likes to do the same things....has the same traits (personality)...I believe environment has a part to do with the human behavior...but genes play a bigger role.

2006-10-01 14:42:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I don't think anyone really knows. One thing I have seen for myself is my teenage son writes like and has really similar gestures to his father, and we haven't even lived with his dad since before my son was a year old. Even the position my son sleeps in in like his dad. That indicates to me that some behavior must be accredited to genetics.

2006-10-01 14:37:59 · answer #5 · answered by tsopolly 6 · 1 0

does it matter? i mean, really, unless you've been hatched in a petri dish, and raised in a lab your whole life, you're going to be affected by the environment. wait, i stand corrected, even if you were said lab rat, you would be affected by that environment. you'd probably be very fussy and have perfect ettiquette, and be intolerant of germs. so, what i'm trying to say, is that the environment will leak in everywhere, and although one man's gene pool might allow him/her to cope better with the lab - another might be enviornmentally & philosophically allergic to that same place and pine for bohemia. so, it's the yin and the yang, like it or lump it.

2006-10-01 14:32:55 · answer #6 · answered by amuse4you 4 · 1 1

My guess is that its about 50/50..genes play an enormous part in who we are and how we act (this gets more noticable as we age) but our environment must and does affect our lives...

2006-10-01 14:37:04 · answer #7 · answered by OliveRuth 4 · 0 1

I think it does. So much of behavior is learned from our surroundings and our family, friends and community. Genetics only take us so far.

2006-10-01 14:36:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

earlier I answer this question,i wish you're speaking about emotional tolerance and not in any respect actual tolerance.the reason because your body has your tolerance limits.of direction at the same time as someone shoots your with a bullet you could't live to inform the tale.Thats to do together with your actual tolerance to respond to your question , It relies upon on the attitude. Its a worry-loose tendency to imagine that tolerance in course of rudeness,sarcasm,conceitedness would recommend that its will be effortless to tolerate actual soreness On a deeper factor ,its no longer about being actual or being verbal, its about what impacts the recommendations the most case in factor, someone would tolerate even the most insulting component stated to him/her by skill of someone, in spite of the indisputable fact that it could be difficult for them to pardon particular movements carried out to them/their kin/their united states of america. what number can tolerate the acts of terror carried out by skill of Kasab?.How a lot can they tolerate that once compared to insults thrown at them/their kin/their community/their united states of america? It varies from human being to human being This doesnt recommend that actual harm is difficult to tolerate than verbal abuse yet i'm giving an social gathering of ways particular movements impacts your recommendations. it truly is the position the conserving "action speaks louder than words" includes play some human beings ever say "words will be forgiven yet movements can't" yet on an exceedingly worry-loose accepted foundation of life, words have a tendency to electrify the recommendations better regularly than actual movements.some human beings have suffered extremely some actual injuries yet that looks a lot less "painful" for them than those the position they have been abused and overwhelmed.The results of abuse makes the variety of magnitude!!! it truly is the position the conserving "Pen is mightier than sword" includes play On both activities,all of it boils right down to what impacts the recommendations the most.The words have an effect better regularly than movements.So in accordance to this,you've your tolerance factor

2016-11-25 21:36:18 · answer #9 · answered by longacre 4 · 0 0

It really depends on what the person chooses to act like

2006-10-01 14:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by Roxxi 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers