Anyone else agree the pResident has been lying to the American public for years ?

Question

Until this invasion/ occupation/ and now world-wide-war on terra got started, I would not have believed we could be so misled.
We need to get our people the >>>> out as soon as we practically can. I am sorry Mr Bush had to tie his presidency to a victorious outcome ( what ever that will be like?) ,in this war in Iraq.
We don't have to go down in flames with him as he " stays the course ".

JC: Agreed. Its like a political spectator sport. The blood is in the water and the fins are circling. But it could not happen to a more deserving adminisitration.

Answer 1

don't believe everything you think

Answer 2

I don't think bush has any idea whats so ever, about what he
talks about. He's just repeating the words of cheney & rumsfeld.
They say social security is going to run out of money in 2012,
& that this war might last untill 2026 - can Americans really
afford this? I have a feeling the consequences of this administration will be felt for generations to come.
Bushes legacy.

Bob Woodwards book will be all over TV this week & Colin
Powell has one comming out, too. We'll be hearing the
truth all over the place pretty soon.

Answer 3

you have the two by no skill served interior the defense force or in case you probably did, you paid no interest to the oath(s) what you swore. protecting The shape is barely portion of it. the different portion of the oath is obeying the orders of the President and the officers appointed over you. while a defense force guy or woman tries to sue the government there are 2 probable effects. Lose or lose badly. basically a tiny fraction have EVER prevailed and maximum lose badly. people who undertaking the authority of the chain of command continuously lose badly. With recognize to his rank yet no longer his guy or woman, Lt Easterling is an fool. he's authorized a fanatical group to apply his solid call in a healthful problematical the authority of the President to preside over the defense force. he will lose badly in this one. sufficient so as that he could perhaps be tried at court docket Martial as quickly as that is over. His odds of triumphing are 0 -- Google the Feres Doctrine and you will see has has no risk -- and triumphing is the only way that he can keep away from skill sanctions. From a criminal point of view, Fitz' criticism is farcical and proves that he does not recognize the Constitutional definition of treason, the only crime set forth interior the form. He does have the preserve of retirement to guard him regardless of the undeniable fact that the defense force could re-turn on him and if he did no longer withdraw the criticism at that element he'd face Easterling's destiny. Your utter loss of information of Roosevelt's words distinctly a lot wraps up the prestige of your "question" as that of a partisan rant and little else.

Answer 4

I do agree. Maybe it's pathological. It does seem like he believes what he says is true, for the time being.
Late 9/11 he said we will get whoever is behind this. Yet Osama roams free as ever.
On Katrina, he said Brown was doing an awesome job, next day, we found out not so good.
Now, he says we are winning the war. Not true either. Insurgent attacks higher than before our invasion.
No Child Left Behind, his platform for re-election is failing those who need help most.
Everything he touches or says has become a total disaster. I sure am glad he hasn't done anything about Social Security, or National Insurance Coverage. Medicare has been messed up, with seniors paying more out of pocket than ever before.

Answer 5

I don't agree.

The president has to make very difficult decisions based on the information he receives. If the information is faulty, although he is still ultimately responsible when he reports on this information, he is not lying.

His conclusions were pretty much the same as both houses of Congress and several foreign nations and unless someone can prove he had actually known that his information was false, again, he was not lying.

Rumors and conspiracy theories and opinions are not verifiable proof - and most are not even factual.

I do agree with you that his presidency and legacy is directly tied to the outcome of his policies in the war on terror - most specifically, the war in Iraq.

Answer 6

You people don't give up. The lying stopped when the thief and cheat got his sorry *** out of the White house. The country was on the upswing when your hero (By the question I assume you think Clinton a hero) got into office. The Country was on a down swing when the Honorable George W. Bush assumed Command. Wake up, when this country is destroyed you idiots will be boo hoo, how could we be so dumb. For the same reason you would probably buy get rich systems. Pathetic

Answer 7

Congratulations for having given the world a really goo d expression for what the Bush gouvenment is doing.
"War on terra" sums it up nicely.
Yes, and I do think he was, is, and will be lying.

Answer 8

The president was lying to the American public for years, 8 to be exact, but get over it, Clinton is now out of office.

Answer 9

ur crazy. the fact that u think we can just pull our troops out shows ur ignorance take a chill u conspiracy loving freak. Its so sad that u are worried more about ur own skin the the millions of iraqis that are finally stepping toward the freedom u take advantage of. Its people like u who dont deserve it!

Answer 10

That's like asking, "Do you agree the sky is blue?" Of course it's true - plenty of congressional reports and overseas news organizations have said it for years. Funny thing, though, how are so-called "liberal media" didn't take up the stories until Bush's polls began dropping ...

Answer 11

yes since 1880