English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now I don't want answers from people who thinks that cena rules and the best wrestler alive and blinded by the WWE and also from people who just chant DX! DX! DX!, NWO 4 life!, TNA! TNA! TNA! and ECW! ECW! ECW!. I want comments, suggestions about strong and weak points of the company, etc. I ask people who knows what they are saying and have seen both of the company's shows and those who don't see just one side of the situation. I'll appreciate it if you will.

2006-10-01 13:10:07 · 12 answers · asked by Andrei 1 in Sports Wrestling

12 answers

TNA would dominate in the future becuase it's fast-paced wrestling and less talking. I don't watch TNA much because it comes on later.

2006-10-01 13:13:25 · answer #1 · answered by Yay Area 5 · 0 1

WWE no contest, the money, the name, the wrestlers as a result of the money. The mainstream world has never heard of TNA and wont because they only care for WWE just because of its history and Vince. Unless Vince or Ted Turner of some huge billionaire ever buys TNA, WWE will dominate it for years. You can say its good wrestling or whatever, but bottum line is when Rock's film career ends, he's coming back Stone Cold will be back, they can have any TNA wrestlers they want if they want to pay for it, and if TNA ever takes even a fraction of their merchandise sales or ratings, the will. TNA will be bankrupt in no more than 5 years, due to lack of audience. sorry, i like what they are doing, but it wont happen

2006-10-02 05:07:41 · answer #2 · answered by Hafeman 5000 4 · 0 0

WWE.Hands down.WWE is dominating right now.TNA comes on too late and they don't even promote their show much.WWE is a bigger company,its been on the scene for along time,and people are already accustomed to it.People see TNA as a want to WWE company.I like TNA,but there are people who are just gonna look at TNA and say wannabe.Now that I have wrote this I don't know who will come out on top because TNA superstars have been talking abouot the WWE.It might be a war

2006-10-01 14:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by TJones 2 · 0 0

lots of the expertise might the two be out of a job or pushed to NXT or OVW. a pair of the present ideal TNA men like AJ varieties, Abyss, The Dudley's, Jeff Hardy, Bobby Roode, Kurt attitude and Austin Aries might bypass after the titles only approximately immediately away or be in the main efficient adventure. A benefit that would desire to come of this could be a super revamping of the tag group branch nevertheless, i advise that they had have lots of extra expertise that needed some thing to do. The knockouts might fall into nothingness, like maximum WWE divas those days - beside the point. yet as long as Vince is in value he'd probable bury maximum of them. And once you're thinking.... No Sting would not be on the roster, he refuses to artwork for Vince McMahon.

2016-10-18 08:01:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Nobody will admit it, but TNA is just another WWE farm league. Vince even gave air time to promote TNA's prez's DVD (Dusty Rhodes) They might be trying to keep it a secret (like they kept ECW being bankrolled by mcmahon a secret) but it's the truth.

2006-10-01 13:57:06 · answer #5 · answered by sandman96dwg 2 · 1 0

Unfortunately Probably WWE.
TNA needs to start putting together a prime time show just to compete properly.
WCW had its down fall when they followed the WWE scenerio style. TNA needs to keep with what makes it different in this fashion. Kill the Cornet vs the Jeff Jarrett association game before it gets old.
Stick to a 70% in ring and 30% out of ring line up and you will have a chance to take McMahons brass ring.

2006-10-01 13:18:57 · answer #6 · answered by Shadow 2 · 0 0

I think in the future Vince is gonna own TNA just like he owns everything else now so either way both of those shows are gonna dominate.

2006-10-01 20:52:10 · answer #7 · answered by XxMorningstarXx 1 · 0 0

neither. i feel their will be a new contender over the next few years. tna has too many stale wrestlers dominating the show(it reminds me of wcw in 2000). vince mcmahon is just plain crazy and has too much creative control over wwe. an interesting thing i read a while ago was the ted turners no wrestling clause is about to expire in 07. that means he could get into the pro wrestling biz. remember, he loved wrestling and is the one that poured money into wcw to make it the powerhouse it was in 97. it was aol timewarner that took over TNT and basically stripped him of his money. the future looks bright but it's not going to belong to any company that is around right now.

2006-10-01 14:36:45 · answer #8 · answered by michael m 2 · 1 0

TNA is actualy wrestling, unlike the WWE. I used to watch WWE, but when they brought the diva search and boogyman in, I left, it is called Wrestling... WWE is just a crappy show. I like TNA alot, they are getting bigger everyday, Kurt Angle just left WWE for TNA. I really can't think of a good thing about WWE, it really changed when Eddie died. Many stars are leaving WWE ior just plan sick of their crap. I think WWE days are numbered.

2006-10-01 14:29:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

For me TNA because they always get a great superstar in the WWE like jeff hardy and christian cage.But the WWE get there own great superstar sooo chooo TNA get out!

2006-10-02 23:11:33 · answer #10 · answered by ♪♫♪Music Lover♪♫♪ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers