2006-10-01 12:37:46 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I love how birdsnake says that clinton "forced" sex on a "young" girl--when he actually had a consensual relationship with a woman who was OF AGE.
foley was sending gay emails and IMs to young boys...
there's a big difference there...
2006-10-01 12:52:52 · answer #1 · answered by mamabear84 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It was one creep, who shilled everyone who trusted him. I am a Democrat, and it irks me that there was a cover up for some time. But all Reps can't be blamed. Please note what a 2urd he was:
"Beginning with his 1993 sponsorship of a measure in the Florida state legislature to seize the cars of men who solicited prostitutes, former restaurant owner and real estate agent Mark Foley repeatedly attracted a flattering political spotlight by inveighing against those involved in sexual crimes and presenting himself as a protector of exploited children.
Beginning with his 1993 sponsorship of a measure in the Florida state legislature to seize the cars of men who solicited prostitutes, former restaurant owner and real estate agent Mark Foley repeatedly attracted a flattering political spotlight by inveighing against those involved in sexual crimes and presenting himself as a protector of exploited children."
Makes you wonder how many young boys he messed up.
Want to add that Monica wasn't a child, and Clinton wasn't the first married man she had an affair with. Dumb to think she saved the blue dress for a souvenir.
2006-10-01 13:02:15 · answer #2 · answered by saltydog 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one has charged him yet. The guy admitted he was unwise in his e-mailings. Lets let the law take its course.The Dem's are not that Innocent. They had a congressmen who was using page boys to pimp for him & he got a senture& a slap on the wrist. So both parties need to watch what their members are up to.
2006-10-01 12:51:01 · answer #3 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
oh im laughing my @$$ off on this one.
this is the best question i've ever heard.
i can't wait to see how many republican nutjobs will try to defend their stupid party.
its like they all purposely work together to do things wrong, and then when one of them gets caught they are automatically disowned from the GOP.
2006-10-01 12:42:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Republicans are hypocrites, obviously. It's a proven fact that being overly homophobic means you're surpressing your own faggotry.
2006-10-01 12:48:14 · answer #5 · answered by trafficjams 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
same position the Democrat social gathering will be devoid of them? only conserving, honey. thanks a lot for letting us recognize the way you sense. Your instructors taught you properly, and also you'll bypass far in this life. absolute self belief about it. no longer a one. assume it.
2016-11-25 21:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To paraphrase Fred Allen, "_________s sow wild oats 6 days a week then go to church on the seventh to pray for a crop failure."
2006-10-01 12:47:42 · answer #7 · answered by Skeff 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a bunch of Bull. How can make this political? Because he happened to be republican? Sounds more like you are pimping out this kid for political gain!
2006-10-01 12:41:43 · answer #8 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Maybe they already have an easy time getting their boys. What do they need to change the laws for?
2006-10-01 12:45:45 · answer #9 · answered by Paul 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because they cannot let the fact be known that they love teen boys
2006-10-01 12:46:21 · answer #10 · answered by Michelle : 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋