These whack-jobs prevent their children enjoying fiction because they may be corrupted by Witchcraft but don't seem to mind indoctrinating them with the false belief of Religion.
Dangerous hypocrites or am I wrong?
2006-10-01 12:37:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Religion is the greater danger and it doesn't have to be fundamentalist. A little bit of religion is like a little bit of syphilis, unless eradicated always gets worse.
2006-10-01 14:43:40 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do we have an open mind here or what? Harry Potter does introduce children to witchcraft. In the movies they cast spells and so forth. What part of that isn't wrong to teach children? I'm not saying that children shouldn't enjoy fictiontional literature, just not the kind that could be used as a gateway for sorcery. If you aren't a Christian, how can you judge people who are? You seem ****** and ready to fire on people who don't agree with your thoughts on this matter. Fire away! I've got the greatest nonfictional person on my side: Jesus!
2006-10-01 12:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by Leaving on a jetplane 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are wrong only in the sense that you have limited the fundamentalism to the Christian faith rather than applying it to all religions.
Otherwise, you are correct. The hypocrisy has spread out of control and has been disguised as morality.
Adopting these hypocritical beliefs has resulted in a fantastic inversion of values. This disease is spreading out of control.
2006-10-01 12:43:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the two my spouse and that i are Christians and we the two chosen to not have teenagers to the element of me getting a vasectomy some years in the past. teenagers at the instant are not for each guy or woman and those people having them while they actually can not have the money for them are purely going to make their existence extra sturdy and the baby is going to boost up in poverty. some people think of that in case you marry you musts start up a kin it somewhat is crap for my area infants at the instant are not decrease priced; it is tough sufficient on the present time and age with our monetary device to stay paycheck to paycheck devoid of toddlers. I desire having some dependable animals that on no account communicate back, do not use you like an ATM, and on no account enable you recognize to Foff.. the only draw back is cleansing up poop each so often or vomit i'm happy with that. teenagers are a decision no be counted the religion; there is not any reason you need to have teenagers!
2016-12-15 18:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by vanderlinden 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religious extremism is unhealthy, regardless of how it manifests. Last century, the winner of the killing prize was Marxism. National Socialism and Emperor worship rounded out the top three.
This century is off to a equally thrilling start...
2006-10-01 12:47:36 · answer #5 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Both are serrious problems.
I would give Potter a 2, and NeoCon Jesus a 2.1 out of 10.
2006-10-01 12:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, you're right. People who believe Harry Potter is dangerous should not be allowed to have children.
2006-10-01 12:42:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Fundamentalism. And they try to ban other books all the time. What anyone could have against Catcher in the Rye or Lord of the Flies is beyond me;
2006-10-01 12:51:25 · answer #8 · answered by notme 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are exactly right. Those fundies try to shelter their kids from the evils of Halloween and goblins and such, but the gorey image of Christ being nailed to a cross is just wonderful. How disgusting is that?
I'm glad there are reasonalble people like you.
2006-10-01 12:39:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Christain Fascism.
2006-10-01 12:38:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋