2006-10-01 11:00:11 · 4 answers · asked by julean33 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Why do they 'have to go back in?'
To kill all the civilians they missed killing the first time around? To flatten the buildings they didn't flatten first time round?
If they do 'go back in' they should mind out that they don't step on the tens of thousands of banned anti-personnel mines they left lying around for people to step on.
You should take your wars of lies and hate and stick them where the sun don't shine.
2006-10-01 11:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by Bring back Democracy 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Unless provoked Hezbollah is not going to attack Israel...they are a resistance movement who fights against Israeli's occupation.Their goal ,in 1982 at their creation,was to draw Israel out of Southern Lebanon and they did it...if Hezbollah wouldn't have existed Southern Lebanon would have been now part of Israel...
The presence of the Israeli soldiers in a land that it's still disputed between Israel and Lebanon was saw as an act of provocation...So yes ,they should pull out of Lebanon and I don't think they have any reason to go back...
2006-10-02 06:16:39 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No Israel needs to stay in Lebanon and sort out the terrorists that keep attacking innocent people. It is the eighty twenty rule. 80% of the population on both sides just want to get on with normal life but 20% are determined to mess it up for everyone.
2006-10-01 18:06:00 · answer #3 · answered by Gill T 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
America should take a position on this and not just listen to Isreal. No one wants to live in an occupied country....I think they should get out.
2006-10-01 18:10:43 · answer #4 · answered by domainguy 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋