2006-10-01 10:26:20 · 14 answers · asked by H.I. of the H.I. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because he was in an elementary classroom reading a book about a goat to children that day?
2006-10-01 10:28:23 · update #1
I don't expect racist, heterofascist, warmongers would ever rat out their President even if he is a traitor.
2006-10-01 11:34:39 · answer #1 · answered by IMRU? 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
So how do you get that the people who support President Bush are racist, "heterofascist" warmongers? Your ignorance astounds me.
Here's how I know:
Because the people accusing him of such are still alive.
Remove your tin foil hat, come back to reality.
It was terrorists. Period.
2006-10-01 10:40:18 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they're the two quite corrupt evil adult men. the only reason Obama gets much less flack from the voters of united statesa. is with the help of the fact a million: he's greater likable, and 2: simply by fact he's of african history. Obama is an evil guy. whilst he replace into in Chicago, he greater a scheme the place he and his cohorts might enable Chicago residences fall apart and degrade, then he might ask for Chicago tax funds and pay HIMSELF to demolish the crumbling homes- and rebuild new residences on suited of the previous... rinse and repeat. of direction no person talks approximately that. additionally, Obama works with Drug Cartels in Mexico inspite of the incontrovertible fact that he tries to enforce the conflict on drugs federal government regulations. on an identical time as Bush went to a conflict illegally under fake pretenses and has thoroughly destroyed Iraq it extremely is on the verge of a Civil conflict simply by Iraqi government oppressing the voters, Obama keeps the conflict in Afghanistan and plans on utilising TAX PAYER funds to deliver MERCENARIES to Afghanistan- therefor the government's presence continues to be there and we are nonetheless dropping BILLIONS of greenbacks killing rebels and harmless people who might do no injury to united statesa.'s harmless. Obama additionally makes use of drones to kill 1000's of harmless adult men, females, and infants- it extremely is unlawful and is a sort of terrorism itself. Bush had Gitmo opened and tortured the illegally abducted alleged "terrorists", yet Obama reinstated military tribunals, genuinely destroying his promise to the human beings. He additionally keeps the torture by skill of rigidity feeding human beings, and putting them in small rooms with loud metallic music taking part in and strobe lights (psychological torture) Obama has additionally prosecuted the main whistleblowers interior the history of Presidents, and has an energetic conflict on Press (see recent AP/DOJ Scandal) Obama is a administration freak. Obama is a corrupted guy. he's an evil guy. yet you could desire to obey. you could desire to be a sheep.
2016-12-12 18:36:02 · answer #3 · answered by andie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well we have it on good authority that it was a collection of lib-tard, trouser trout trollers meeting in west coast bath houses that were behind (pardon the pun) 9-11...LOL!
2006-10-01 10:30:01 · answer #4 · answered by juandos 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How do you know that he is? From what I've seen of the evidence, the conspiracy theories don't hold water.
2006-10-01 10:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by Will 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hum...was Bush also behind the 93 bombing of the WTC?
2006-10-01 10:34:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why dont you ask the people who were there?The firefighters and the policemen and the other emergency personel.How disrespectful of you to even think of it.Put your pea brain back on art bell and stay the hell out of politics you freaking loon.
2006-10-01 10:29:35 · answer #7 · answered by halfbright 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Where the **** do you people get this piece of crap?
It is a freakin' money trail, that is what all conspiracy's are.
http://lolloosechange.co.nr/
Have you even seen this?
2006-10-01 10:31:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because they have at least an ounce of common sense.
2006-10-01 10:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I thought it was illogical to have to prove a negative...
Liberals should follow the rules they invent...
2006-10-01 10:29:35 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋