English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am president of the Philosophy Club at my school. Every other week we meet to discuss a paper. Both students and full time faculty attend. I am in charge of finding these papers. I am looking for something that is about the length of a standard journal article, or maybe a shorter book chapter, accessable enough that novices can participate, but (more importantly) complex enough that professional PhD philosophers can be entertained by an hour discussion on the topic. These pieces need to be controvercial, and it would help if they weren't extremely well known in that subsection of the field. Maybe a spurious argument for something that seems at face value to be false, but might require some work to pin down what the actual problem was. If you all knew of anything like this, it would be extremely helpful. The more the better!

2006-10-01 10:19:00 · 4 answers · asked by Jason H 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Here's an example of the sort of thing that I mean.
There is an article by David Benetar, called "Why it is better to have never come into existence", in which he argues for that very thesis. It is something which at face value seems untrue, but his argument isn't straightforwardly wrong. Its not wrong because of an emiprical claim; instead, it takes a little bit of philosphical digging to find a problem with it. And the subject matter is open to newbies, while the paper is advanced enough to keep old pros interested. Anything like this, or that would fulfill those criterion? Come on, someone has to have the name of a single paper! :)

2006-10-03 11:25:55 · update #1

4 answers

Hello Jason!
Well, I would suggest you to get some documents written by, or about, Epicurus! They will assist you and your audience to improve your lives!
Another would be the explanation of your name: Jason!

2006-10-06 20:48:51 · answer #1 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 0 0

i'm no longer particular if that is on topic, yet I examine a e book through ok.C. Cole that suggested some exciting research about what human beings _don't_ see. in a unmarried attempt, that they had someone quit someone and ask for instructions. even as they were speaking, some different person, dressed as a structure worker, wearing a huge door, surpassed between them. A 2d individual develop into behind the door, and switched places with the guy who had initially requested instructions. fairly some the time, the guy who develop into giving instructions might want to bypass on speaking, no longer understanding that they were chatting with a thoroughly diverse stranger. In yet another study, someone develop into instructed to visual demonstrate unit a video that confirmed human beings tossing a ball again and forth and count number the style of performed tosses. each and every thing appeared high quality, and the guy got here up with the style of tosses. yet then, they were instructed to visual demonstrate unit the video again, this time without counting the tosses. even as they weren't distracted through counting, they said a guy in a gorilla healthful come out and stand in the approach the game for a lengthy time period!

2016-12-04 02:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by aneshansley 4 · 0 0

Why are you the president of the club if you're having to resort to outside help to find a topic. You are as Nietzsche would say "a mere labourer" building on the work of others rather than creating your own foundation.

2006-10-01 10:39:42 · answer #3 · answered by bob kerr 4 · 0 0

You may try getting the works of Richard Rorty. You may also try to dissect the speech of Pope Benedict XVI and why the Muslims worldwide started rallying against him. Although by now, the furor has died down because the Muslim leaders have accepted the pope's apology.

2006-10-01 10:27:25 · answer #4 · answered by chelsea 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers