Tell me why, if you can.
2006-10-01 10:02:17 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, she wouldn't, she's a thief when she took that skimmed money from future trades.
She's spent her entire adult life three steps in front of a grand jury. She could never unite the country, no matter how grave the peril, since she starts with no credibility or respect from about 40% of the public.
Her nomination would allow the Republicans to win again no matter what kind of crooked pimp they rolf up as a candidate.
2006-10-01 10:13:18 · answer #1 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is a socialist from the word go. She poses as a centrist. Even Democrats don't want her. We have a problem because the alternative may not be any better. Bush has hurt this country badly and the mess he is leaving behind, somebody has to deal with. We are not given much choice are we. We are down to the least of two evils. What a day if Hillary turns out to be the least of two evils.
2006-10-01 17:07:21 · answer #2 · answered by pshdsa 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In my opinion, it would be hard for the first woman president to be a good president for she would have to deal with all the problems of being the first female president. I'm not sayign women can't make good presidents, I believe they definately can, but the first female president will have to go through so many things from the public that it will be hard for them to be a great president.
2006-10-01 17:05:22 · answer #3 · answered by locomonohijo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think she is going to run for the office. I could be wrong but I don't see it. Would she be a good president. As to her skills, she would be no worse then Bush, but having her as president would be just as divisive as Bush is now, it would be the continuation of the demise of the nation. There has to be someone else. Someone above the fray. Someone who can being the nation back together.
2006-10-01 17:06:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can get someone like Lewinsky to keep the next president off world issues, that'd be a great success. Bill Clinton did a great job because he didn't do anything.
2006-10-01 17:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. She is too OCD.
Besides the media would have a field day....
Does anyone really trust her?
First Ladies don't antagonize people...its not their job or style.
Hillary was too much.then and now, frankly, I have had enough of Hillary. I think she should remain where she is. Enough is enough.
2006-10-01 22:36:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Compared to Bush? Of course - Hillary Duff would be a better president.
2006-10-01 17:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by lwcomputing 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
WHY YES! she would be a perfect mouthpiece for the wimpy liberals.
NO way with my vote and no other Democrats in office now either.
2006-10-01 17:07:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I guess it all depends on how the USGov decides to run her.
She won't be elected though. It is well-known that the electoral committee would never allow a woman in office. Period.
2006-10-01 17:05:36 · answer #9 · answered by Meht™ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She could possibly be the worst president ever. A title that her husband now holds.
2006-10-01 17:20:59 · answer #10 · answered by SuperMom 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋