why is wealth distributing good?

Answer 1

Let's run the logic.

(1) If a person is weatlhy, they generally are a business owner or investor of some type.
(2) If we force that person to reduce their income by taxing their successes, they will adjust their operating ratios accordingly to stay in business.
(3) One of the first items to adjust in operating ratios is headcount and personnel expenses (eg benefits, etc.)
(4) Therefore, those without wealth would lose their jobs, benefits, etc.
(5) The funds then return to the business, replenishing the supposedly weatlhy owners.

The only ones that lose in wealth distribution are the NON-wealthy. Most people just don't think it through.

If one wants to apply "wealth distribution", they might as well lay off the entry level workers and save the time.

It's a bad idea.

Answer 2

It leads to a more stable society when wealth is distributed through markets. If the government redistributes, it temporarily aids those who receive it while depressing economic activity. However, government redistribution really makes those who vote for it feel good about themselves when they volunteer to hand out someone else's money.

Answer 3

People aren't poor so people don't die, at least int theory, you can't always speak for it in practice...