2006-10-01 09:33:47 · 6 answers · asked by shaan 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
he was a great fellow. its not easy single handedly getting rid of bunch of english.
anyway he got support from his country people but it was his firm determination and will that turned to independence.
2006-10-02 02:16:41 · answer #1 · answered by fars_aswad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what you mean by "good". If you are making normative attachments of honest and peaceful then of course Gandhi was a good man. As mentioned in one of the answers he was able to mobilize people and protest peacefully, most other leaders in the world in history have usually used their ability to mobilize towards questionable ends. For example Lenin.
2006-10-01 16:41:06 · answer #2 · answered by GQ_Finest 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In his own eyes, probably yes.
Sadly, the realisation of his dreams led to the death of milions of people, the dispalcement of dozens of milions, 3 regional wars and a nuclear stalemate which, if broken, may well cause the death of 1,5 bilion people
So sadly, IMO, he was not a good man.
2006-10-01 16:39:47 · answer #3 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One of the best
2006-10-01 16:37:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Ye shall know a tree by the fruit it bears.."
2006-10-01 16:39:09 · answer #5 · answered by B'klyn Barracuda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
was he sexy, if he was, then yes.
2006-10-01 16:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋