why would a third building fall it was the one that held the c.i.a. it was not hit by anything and was far away from the others that fell and other buildings closer where not even touched what was there to hide in there??why where all the vidoes that where taken on the day it happend never shown again only ones that where unclear or from bad angles where used. also why where there no windows in the planes that hit the towers if they were passenger planes they would have had windows???????????????/
2006-10-01 09:33:07 · 12 answers · asked by crazytrain565 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
An engine from one of the planes that hit one of the towers flew into building 7 and started a fire. After the towers collapsed all firefighters were pulled out of the area. While the fire in building 7 didn't look too intense from the outside, it was allowed to burn uncontrolled until it collapsed. When the firefighters talk about "pulling" the building, they meant "pull" all the firefighters out of the area for their safety.
This little game of hunting for conspiracy theories is sick. You're playing games with the dead bodies of almost three-thousand people. Grow up.
2006-10-01 09:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by mrknositall 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Number 7 fell because of fire. Do you honestly think that the amount of jet fuel and fire from Towers 1 and 2 could not affect any other buildings? You're delusional if you think that the government has hidden all the passengers and the planes only to hit the buildings with military aircraft. Passenger planes were hijacked and rammed full speed into the buildings by terrorists. Fully loaded with jet fuel that poured down the inside of the buildings, fueling fires so hot that the floors collapsed one on another on another, getting heavier as the collected on top of each other on the way down, kind of like a domino effect. Wake up and get real!!!!
2006-10-01 21:16:14 · answer #2 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3? i thought there was 4 buildings that fell. the twin towers then 2 more smaller ones later on.
2006-10-01 16:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by namkciub 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Find it next to impossible that plane loaded with enough fuel to make continental flight, which did not explode brought down moderately well constructed skyscraper, but do believe one that exploded could have, because of interview with Towers Building Engineer after first ground attack. Now someone wants me to believe engine from one plane caused fired in steel framed building and caused it to clasp. If these buildings did have steel structure, than do they think we are all as mentally challenged as their leader. The facade might fall off or burn, but any modern steel structure are build to withstand 2 or higher earthquake, and you need extremely intense blowtorch to effect steel.
2006-10-01 17:17:37 · answer #4 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Where did you get information that there were no windows in the planes? It is very obvious this was all a cover up. The goverment covered up a lot of things in this very bad situation. I don't think we will ever know the truth. Very curious though how you found out there were no windows in those planes.
2006-10-01 17:01:40 · answer #5 · answered by copswife93 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think you need to get your information from a more reliable source. Of course there were windows in the planes.
2006-10-01 16:37:57 · answer #6 · answered by Ms. G. 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually there was a total of 7 buildings that were destroyed that morning ,,all in the trade center
2006-10-01 19:14:17 · answer #7 · answered by ggmsixer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I know.
All three towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and no passenger planes were involved.
2006-10-01 23:33:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He is probably just after the truth, something Bush knows nothing about
http://www.st911.org
2006-10-01 16:42:09 · answer #9 · answered by Philip W 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Blab! Blab! Blab!
When will all these stupid, untrue stories ever stop?
2006-10-01 16:56:58 · answer #10 · answered by missingora 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋