He always takes the lead and then runs the ball. After that the other team scores and we dont have time to score points to tie. (take the Chargers-Baltimore game for example)
2006-10-01 09:17:57 · 5 answers · asked by Glenn 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
You're absolutely right, too many times he has gone vanilla when he has a lead, you'd think he'd have learned his lesson after last season. The fact is : the chargers are a better team than the ravens, they were better on both sides of the ball today. But again, incredibly bad conservative play calling lost them the game. Shottenheimer and Cam Cameron were playing to lose this game from the second quarter. Call it a post loss rant if you will, but I just don't see an end to games like this one as long as Schotty is at the helm.
2006-10-01 09:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He feels like a coach who can in easy terms take a team so a procedures... Schottenheimer can get you to a convention very final...you want a Dan Reeves or Marv Levy to get you to the great Bowl...then you definately want a Jimmy Johnson, Mike Shanahan or a hoodie to win all of it. That being suggested, if I owned the taking part in cards, Lions, Browns or any CFL team, i might welcome Marty with open hands.
2016-12-12 18:34:40 · answer #2 · answered by andie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Schottenheimer was run out of Cleveland and Kansas City for the same reson.
2006-10-01 13:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by turkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Schittenheimer sucks and Billick is happy that he does. If Schittenheimer didn't sit on a lead he would totally confuse every other NFL head coach.
2006-10-01 15:32:49 · answer #4 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hes a good coach, its just Brian Billick and the ravens are better. Get used to it.
2006-10-01 09:25:26 · answer #5 · answered by jmanjman47 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋