These BABIES are not the "fetuses" you use to justify your killing.
They are viable LIVES...delivered and KILLED.
Some live for a short time.
I had a brother born in 1958 who was as big as some of these babies and he struggled for life for 6 hours!
2006-10-01 08:36:56 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Cliff - this is not a DEAD issue - do you not read your YAHOO HOME PAGE? The Supreme Court has a case pending on this issue.
2006-10-01 09:01:29 · update #1
CCC - why don't you just get sterilized if you want to be a promiscuous person instead of killing a baby?
2006-10-01 09:04:29 · update #2
There have been some babies born at 21 weeks and SURVIVED. I agree with you, I believe in life at conception.
Partial - birth abortion is sick. If you want an abortion you couldnt decide way before you did?
I think abortion is wrong, period, but what kind of person lets someone drill a hole in their babies head and scramble its brains?
2006-10-01 08:44:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
"Instead of cinnamon and spice, our child came with technical terms like hydrocephalus and spina bifida. The spine, she said, had not closed properly, and because of the location of the opening, it was as bad as it got. What they knew -- that the baby would certainly be paralyzed and incontinent, that the baby's brain was being tugged against the opening in the base of the skull and the cranium was full of fluid -- was awful. What they didn't know -- whether the baby would live at all, and if so, with what sort of mental and developmental defects -- was devastating. Countless surgeries would be required if the baby did live. None of them would repair the damage that was already done."
2006-10-01 15:49:36 · answer #2 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't say that. This is why abortion is generally permitted only up to the second trimester. After that it's not permitted because the fetus has achieved life, ie. being able to survive relatively independent of the mother. Anything before then is a totally different story.
Good job on completely avoiding anything worthwhile and trying only to incite anger and rage.
2006-10-01 15:42:00 · answer #3 · answered by azrael505 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Would you like to be the product of the most traumatic experience of someone's life and becuase of this not being love and properly raised, so that you ended your days at the age of 21 because of a back stab in a gang fight???
2006-10-01 15:46:15 · answer #4 · answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Killing babies with American bombs is alright?
That's where people with brains have a problem with you.
You don't care when US bullets land in foriegn children's bellies
but you b*tch when a women chooses to abort.
Word of advice, If religious right protested the war, they would get
more sympathy for their stance on abortion!
2006-10-01 15:44:46 · answer #5 · answered by wlday2002 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No one really cares if Suzie Rottencrotch aborts her out of wedlock, crack baby. Abortion is a political issue used to polarize people into voting a certain way and to give power to certain people. Period.
2006-10-01 15:47:03 · answer #6 · answered by troyboy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are mis-quoting the vast majority of Liberals.
We all say different things, so what you are, in fact, doing is generalizing.
What I say is; "It's just a shame that Barbara (The old Nazi broad) Bush didn't practice abortion before she gave birth to the Anti-Christ."
The reason Catholics don't like abortion is because then they don't have any choir boys to molest.
You are witnessing the Nazification of America!
2006-10-01 15:49:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is just a slope to latter starting killing babiels already born but with defects or even older children that are developmently challenged. This is merley a obvious lack of concern over life itself and its value.
anyone that has ever watched a film of a partial birth abortion knows it is murder.
2006-10-01 15:40:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
you know dumb republicans cut welfare, cut social programs but then force people to have kids. they also cut funds for birth control and republicans ban sex ed and any discussion of it.
ban babies but we wont feed them. you know what repubilcans are would be former slave lovers. they want the poor working masses to feed their greed for massive cash. often not taxed. read up on the golden age in the usa. before unions and tax laws came along.
2006-10-01 15:44:42 · answer #9 · answered by CCC 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i agree with you... did you know that after a "doctor" has aborted (late term) a fetus and thrown it in the trash some of the pro-life activists will take the disposed of baby and care for it- the baby will still be alive, barely. think of the life that poor child will have...... but most liberals DONT agree with LTA.
2006-10-01 15:42:47 · answer #10 · answered by Delete System32 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋