Why doesn't the presence of one determine life (unborn babies develop a heartbeat at just three weeks after conception).
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnmNJp.3cyV6ByfTfmNhZwTzy6IX?qid=20061001122048AAGWcMe
2006-10-01 08:29:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Ooooh I like that, that's a good point!
{Edit}
"Hey, fight with the liberals on this one. They take better care of their pets then their children."
Are you kidding?! I'm a pro-life liberal... so your generalization is there-by FALSE!
Closed-minded fool.
2006-10-01 08:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The presence of a heartbeat definately measurably and detectably confirms the existence of life which began at conception. Untill the heartbeat is detected - life exists as a possibility though it may be very much there. In some countries abortion is illegal because of the existence of life. The earliest indication of its existence - i.e. the mother has concieved - is when the period is missed. The heartbeat gives the signal that indicates that the foetus is alive and well and developing into a baby.
2006-10-01 16:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by DemonInLove 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From the moment of conception a baby's heart is continuosly forming. And not fully formed until 4 weeks after conception. Therefore life begins at the moment of conception.
2006-10-01 15:42:02 · answer #3 · answered by Superman 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its lack of brainwaves that determine death now. A heart an be restarted.
2006-10-01 15:32:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Like i said if there's a heart beat there's life.
2006-10-01 15:38:04 · answer #5 · answered by Phillip m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's a touchy question, i don't think unborn babies are alive until they have a heart beat and brain waves..before that they are almost just a parasitic growth.
but i wouldn't kill it since it's going to be a baby soon..
2006-10-01 15:34:34 · answer #6 · answered by enigma 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Lisa, you don't know me or my child, nor do you know my liberal friends and their children, so kindly fold and insert your assertions.
2006-10-01 16:02:37 · answer #7 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, fight with the liberals on this one. They take better care of their pets then their children.
2006-10-01 15:33:22 · answer #8 · answered by Lisa 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It isnt a human until it breathes.
2006-10-01 15:32:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋