Most of us would lie, if it'd "save our skin". Is she any different?
2006-10-01 05:33:04 · 10 answers · asked by charly 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
She has nothing to lie about. Your fishing in a pond with no fish...
2006-10-01 05:45:39 · answer #1 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If she were absolutely sure there was no way she could be proven wrong.
If you were to ask the question about Colin Powell, I feel my answer would be different. Perhaps the most ethical man to hold any kind of office in the White House since Jimmy Carter.
2006-10-01 12:36:42 · answer #2 · answered by finaldx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condi is the ONLY pol in D.C. that I would trust not to outright lie. Hedge, dissemble? Maybe but that goes with the nefarious territory.
So much distrust - so little time. As if the Executive Branch instills so little...consider the Legislative!
2006-10-01 12:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Beejee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Many people lie to "save their skin".
But Clinton was a Pathological Liar.
He just lied for the fun of it. Just couldn't stand to tell the truth.
2006-10-01 12:36:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like rice, too bad she is pulled down by a governemt tht lies
2006-10-01 12:40:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of question is this. It sounds like "who would win in a fight Batman or Superman?" Do you have a point.
2006-10-01 12:53:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She'd lie if you asked her the time of day!
2006-10-01 12:39:22 · answer #7 · answered by MC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is she human, or not? Enough said.
2006-10-01 12:34:26 · answer #8 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why not - she lies for emperor bush most everyday!
2006-10-01 12:50:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe she would, and that she has. WMD's, remember?
2006-10-01 13:25:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋