2006-10-01 05:32:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
lol i caught sarcasm in your question so i don't dub as a loony.i think this is one of the best jokes of this decade.
2006-10-01 05:35:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 15⤊ 0⤋
When does an apostle of peace start a war, fail to end it, start a second war, fail to adequately prosecute it, then start rattling his sabers about starting a third? I don't think apostles of peace advocate torture or indefinite detention, either. And I don't think apostles of peace advocate taking from the poor and giving to the rich, the effect of the Bush tax cuts. George Bush is no apostle, nor is he an advocate of peace.
2006-10-01 12:42:30 · answer #2 · answered by Steve in Denver 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
But the reality is that George W Bush is deadly against the peace, creates wars, destroys the nations.
2006-10-01 12:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by mushtaqehind 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it does not brand you as a nut. I personally don't like the president mostly because his actions have cost our nation many dead soldiers and some dead hostages.
I am not sure but I thought Apostles were peace makers and he certainly isn't one.
2006-10-01 12:39:58 · answer #4 · answered by Juanitamarie 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
any sane person on this earth say that bush is apostle of peace
2006-10-03 03:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by nightingale 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
By their fruits ye shall know them...George's fruits have been war, hate, more war, destruction, torture, fraud, lying, deception, character assassination, dishonor, destruction of a country (USA), destruction of the Constitution, widescale slaughter of innocent women and children, bullying, threats of destruction, incompetence, ignoring and rejecting advice from people who know better, willful disregard of the rights of others...If this is what you think makes a man a man of peace, you're not a nut, you're...Well, let me be polite, you're six bottles short of a six pack.
2006-10-01 12:41:22 · answer #6 · answered by Pandak 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Apostle of war,famine and destruction would be more appropriate for Bush.
2006-10-01 12:34:13 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Most certainly. Maybe we can get you a nice padded room somewhere. And if you're lucky, maybe we can get you a room next to John Skerry.
2006-10-01 14:39:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The evidence speaks for itself.
2006-10-01 12:36:23 · answer #9 · answered by notme 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dead bodies are peaceful.
2006-10-01 12:44:33 · answer #10 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋