Conservatives must be stupi how also would they vote twice for and continue to support a draft dodging, backwood redneck from texas this guy will go down in history as the worst and most stupidest and ignarant leader of all time
2006-10-01 05:12:32 · 31 answers · asked by Donald D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
nah some of em have 41
2006-10-01 05:14:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
your question would be stated better if you changed it to this:
Do all liberals have an IQ of less than 40?
Libs must be stupid how also would they vote twice for and continue to support a draft dodging, backwood redneck from Arkansas this guy will go down in history as the worst and most stupidest and ignorant leader of all time
Since you have such a low IQ yourself use the spell check its there for a reason.
2006-10-01 12:28:45 · answer #2 · answered by Bob 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
While 'stupi' may be a typo, 'from Texas this guy' and 'most stupidest and ignarant' most certainly are not. Besides, there is that 'Check Spelling' option. I'd have to say your question is at about a 3rd grade level for private school and 12th grade for public.
2006-10-01 13:44:13 · answer #3 · answered by Will 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did you just call me "stupi" ? I resent being called "stupi" and i am far from "ignarent". When questioning someone else's intelligence you might want to make sure that you do not expose the fact that you are a moron.
I am a right winger who is a member of Mensa, I also have a Masters Degree. Now go get my burger for me boy.
He has also proved his intelligence by threatening me, good luck there. He also accused me of being a racist although he gives no indication in his question that he is a member of any minority group. Typical liberal, if calling someone stupid or "stupi" does not work play the race card. I continue to question his intelligence.
P.S. He misspelled most of the threatening e mail.
2006-10-01 12:19:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
The number you give is not an IQ number. It is actually an emotional maturity rating.
When pointing out ignorance in others, proper spelling and grammar are often quite important, as is a thorough understanding of the subject matter. Attempt to understand the following: appearance is one thing, while reality might be entirely something else. The public world is full of people who specialize in creating appearances for themselves. George W isn't uneducated or a "redneck". That is merely his public persona- a way to get people to vote for him. And it works. Almost half of the people who voted in the last election fell for it.
The reality is that he is a Texas oil man and we are fighting a war about oil. Don't let the hype confuse you.
2006-10-01 12:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by anyone 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It's pretty ironic that you would criticize conservatives for their "low intelligence quotients" when your question is replete with grammatical errors. "Most stupidest"? "Ignarant"?
Anyway, to answer your question, NO! IQ has NOTHING whatsoever to do with political persuasion, or vice versa.
By the way, it's IGNORANT, not ignarant.
I know plenty of intelligent people who voted for President Bush, and plenty of IGNORANT imbeciles who voted for Kerry. I myself voted for Bush, I don't regret it, and I have an average IQ (depending on the tests) of around 130. My highest was 150-something, but I think that was just a fluke. And yes, I do consider myself well-informed; I pay attention to the news, and not just the headlines.
I have a plethora of reasons to still support the president, but I'm not going to bother to elaborate here, as I think the answer you're looking for is something similar to this:
"Yes, the 'neocons' are idiotic, moronic imbeciles."
2006-10-01 12:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Thank you for the question friend and please do not fret by the low IQ'ers who cannot distinguish betwen a typo and a spelling mistake.
That said, I truly believe that if statistics were done it would be quite apparent that a lower IQ would be a pre-requisite to accepting, embracing and endorsing the drivel and rhetoric used to entice conservative votes.
So you are correct -
Look at those who are innovators, scientists, nobel prize winners, people who make a difference to the global well being, all with high IQs, I bet if you took the numbers there would be a greater percentage of high IQS on the left than the right.
I have no doubt. It takes a monkey to vote for a monkey and a dense bush to vote for shrub...
2006-10-01 12:40:02 · answer #7 · answered by meldorhan 4 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Not everyone has the same perspective on issues. It is not an indication of IQ. The "smart" thing to do is to listen to all sides of an issue, do some research of your own and create your own opinion. Then you can take action on behalf of that opinion, knowing the facts and having the ability to convince others of your position.
2006-10-01 12:17:42 · answer #8 · answered by Melody 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
"most stupidest".....need I say more? Wow! If people like you are an indication of the future of America, we are in BIG trouble...
People in glass houses, in this case low IQ brackets, should not throw stones....
2006-10-01 12:24:03 · answer #9 · answered by CrazyCatLady 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Some are smart but just evil or mentally disabled.you know there is a difference.
Like the criminally insane,they can have pretty high IQ's
2006-10-01 12:22:45 · answer #10 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Wrong, foreign boy.
The Draft-Dodging Hick that never worked a day in his life, was Bill Clinton.
Do you have leaders you like in your own country?
2006-10-01 12:21:04 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋