did you circumcise?

Question

Have you had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners?

Which do you prefer?

Why?

How did intercourse feel different?

would/did u circumcise your boys?

Answer 1

yes i have had both circumcised partners and I prefer circumcised ones. I think that they look far more attractive, they are easier to keep clean, the sexual sensation was more pleasurable (though not a lot to be honest, and yes I have had more than 1 of each sort of partner)
as i understand it, in America boys are circumcised as a matter of course and this is not so in most other (non, Muslim or Jewish) countries.
If i had children, i don't think that i would have them circumcised as a matter of course unless there was a medical issue involved or if i lived a lifestyle where hygiene would be a problem (not easy access to a lot of water) or if i lived in a very sandy place (if can get trapped underneath)
I think that unless it is religious or medical or for a good logical reason, it is purely cosmetic and up to the young man to decide. I have hard several circumcised men say that they are much more dependent on they partners for pleasure because a circumcision, especially a tight one makes it difficult for them to masturbate in the traditional manner as there is nothing to protect the head and it gets sore and there is less "slide" so to speak.
also when they are unfortunate to have an accident with a zip, its never foreskin, its always the head that gets zipped up :(

Answer 2

I didn't circumsice my two boys. One was born partially circumcised so he gets the best of both worlds, the other just has the anteater. I've had both types of penis, I think uncircumsized makes some things easier - hand jobs, etc. It's a little freaky at first, but I had a great time. Although, I do like the look and feel of a cut tip too. However, what it came down to for me was a huge double standard. If someone offered to circumsice your newborn daughter, would you let them? Hell no! Why put your little man through the same senseless and painful procedure? It isn't even required by religion anymore (check your facts people before you correct me about Jewish requirements). Kids actually die from this, or end up losing the head of their penis entirely - it happened in the last 10 years in BC. Abbotsford I think, 2001. Is it worth the smallest risk (Sorry about your useless penis son, I thought this might look better) to your otherwise perfectly healthy son? You decide. Good luck. At worst, he can do it later if he wants to, but the procedure to regrow foreskin is a little more involved.

Answer 3

I am pregnant with a son and he will not be circumcised. I would not mutilate him for no good reason. My husband is not circumcised and has never had any medical problems. I would hope that the child will be taught proper hygiene and cleanliness will never be an issue. It only involves rolling back the skin and washing, not rocket science. Intercourse is no different for the woman, and supposedly more pleasurable for the man. And once erect looks no different wether circumcised or not. I actually read recently that more and more people are not circumcising so I highly doubt teasing would be an issue. I don't recall ever seeing any of my friends or class mates naked, so don't know where this teasing idea comes from?

Answer 4

No, I didn't sexually mutilate my son.... I wouldn't do it to my daughter either.. to those people saying that it can cause medical problems, that's stupid! would you cut up a girl so that she would stay clean? I would hope that you are smart enough to teach a child to clean themselves properly.... and as for sex, it is actually more enjoyable for uncircumcised men, when you cut off the foreskin, the penis rubs against clothing and becomes rough and not as sensitive... any doctor worth a cent would not recommend circumcising.....

Answer 5

I circumcised my son for two reasons. First, to avoid medical problems later on. These medical problems aren't all that common and can be typically avoided by keeping clean, but my husband is in the medical profession and treated a couple of problems that could have been avoided by circumcision. He said it's better to go ahead and avoid the problems up front.

Second, I have heard of some boys getting teased because they weren't circumcised. In the area I live in, most boys are so it seemed better to cut out one less thing to get grief about.

Unfortunately, I don't think the doctor did a complete circumcision. My son still has a portion of his foreskin left so I may not have eliminated either problem.

Answer 6

Of course not. My son was born perfect and whole. Why on earth would I mess with that?

I've been with both a circumsized and an intact partner. Intact is MUCH better. In frank terms: Circumsized men have lost the ability to lubricate themselves. That's just uncomfortable. The head of their penis has keritinized (dried out and toughened up), so they need to pound a woman to reach fulfillment. They lose a *lot* of sensitivity, so foreplay just isn't as rewarding for them. And over time, a circumsized man has a much higher chance of becoming impotent. An intact man just works right. The foreskin moves right, he's lubricated, and he can match movements in a way that works for both of us. In my experience, he's cleaner and smells better, too, probably because the head of his penis is protected, not just hanging out there.

There is so much misinformation out there about circumcision. There are NO health benefits to circumcision. Read the AAP's most recent statement -- they retract everything they said before about circumcision being beneficial. They were the last medical association to stop recommending circumcision, but they did, and now there isn't one single medical association in the world that recommends it.

Care of an intact penis is easy. Treat it like a finger -- wash the outside and leave it alone. DON'T retract it. A baby boy's foreskin is fused to the glans to help protect it and retracting it causes tears in the skin, pain, scarring, and future medical problems. It will separate on its own sometime between age 3-13, on average. (Yes, that's a big range of normal.) Cleaning underneath the foreskin is like cleaning the inside of a baby girl's vagina, and who does that??? Just wipe the outside and leave it alone; it's designed to keep itself clean on the inside just fine as long as you don't interfere.

My personal preference is for an intact partner. But my sexual preference had nothing to do with my decision to keep my son intact, and I think it's disgusting when a mother says that she likes a circ'ed partner so she circ'ed her son. Why are you thinking about your son and sex in the same context? Yuck! I kept my son intact because it's his body -- his choice. Not mine, and not his father's.

Answer 7

true story from a knuckle head friend of mine:

"I am not sure if I am circumcised but if I am they did a terrible job." Someone actualy said this to me, but he is the same person, that when I asked if he farted he said "no it must be my breath"

Answer 8

You should circumcise for medical reasons. When the boy is an older man being uncircumcised can cause problems. Hygenie is one of those problems the other is the foreskin tends to tighten and create pain. He may end up having to be circumcised then. So when not have him circumcised when he is little and will not remember instead of when he is an adult and will always remember?

Answer 9

Haven't you already asked this question in different categories under a different name?
If you're going to do that you should wait several hours, when there are different people on here.

Answer 10

Uncircumcised is gross. I have had both, I prefer STRONGLY circumcised!

Please just do it, they won't miss what they don't have, and the girls will be happy. Also, they are less prone to getting HIV or other infections (like urinary tract infections) if it is uncircumcised.