Yes and no.
The organization can survive with bad management, if that management has not plagued the entire organization, and does not involve itself with the daily operations of the organization. However, for that to happen, most, if not all, other factors affecting an organization's success must be positive (good workforce, good economic conditions, established product/service, etc.).
However, good management is no guarantee of anything. Ideas are one thing, but they need to be translated into actions from top to bottom before they produce tangible results. But, what looks good on paper, may not necessarily work so well in application.
2006-10-01 04:31:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Engineer Budgie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If good management is not in place then an organisation will not succeed in reaching its goals.
An excellent example of what happens when this maxim is not adhered to is the fate of the late MG Rover company, in the UK.
Self indulgence on the part of those who ran the company (the 'owners' ended up with enormous pension funds, etc., the workers almost nothing), poor future planning, with little investment in new models, stop-gap Indian built 'city cars' (heaps of rubbish) with Rover badging... all were an illustration of of poor management.
Good management will ensure that every body in an organisation feels part of the team, and therefore subscribes to the organisation's philosophy and work ethic.
Keeping with the motor industry example, Honda, NIssan and Toyota in the UK had access to the same indigenous workforce as the former MG Rover company, but the performances of the Japanese owned companies and the defunct British owned firm were worlds apart.
Good management made the difference between success and failure.
2006-10-01 11:50:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by avian 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since an organisation's goals would be decided by management in the first place and a good manager would not set unrealistic goals then I'd agree.
2006-10-01 11:28:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by WAYNE S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋