aren't there alot of americans playing in the world cup??
if there were, they would totally make their team WIN!!!
2006-10-01 03:50:00 · 25 answers · asked by HildaTheCoolChick 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
cadodevine> why do you have to make everything so PERSONAL??? jeese!!
2006-10-01 03:53:44 · update #1
every country can't be good at every sport, America is great with American football, baseball, Canada #1 in Hockey...
2006-10-01 04:20:58 · answer #1 · answered by mørbidsшεεŧnεss 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
America is only allowed one team just like every other country in the world.
The team is only allowed 11 players on the field just like every other team in the world.
The Americans team has to be made up of Americans just like the German team has Germans and the English team only English.
A team wins by being better than another team and scoring more goals which America just isn't that good at.
I am not sure what you are suggesting. Do you think America should have 20 players on the pitch? Even so I think the likes of Brazil, Germany etc would run rings around America.
Do you think they should have a team for each state? So 50 teams for America as opposed to the one team every other country has? Even so I don't think they would get far.
The only way America will win is by getting better and I think that is pretty far off.
I don't really get your question though. Care to rephrase it?
2006-10-01 11:05:34 · answer #2 · answered by â?¥MissMayâ?¥ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There were just as many American footballers playing in the World Cup as any other team... each squad had 23 players, so I wonder why you would think they had fewer players participating in the tournament.
Besides, it's not like you're going to be allowed to send more players onto the field than your opponent, unless a red card was issued.
2006-10-01 10:57:15 · answer #3 · answered by WaterfallOfDestiny 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, I want to refer to those who answered the question. You can learn pretty good English with 10$/month at a languages school. I would suggest you concentrate on writing. As for the question.....it's stupid. The US soccer team is a respectable team, but just doesn't have the push to beat South American or European teams. It's that they concentrated on other sports and got left behind. I think that neither me or my children will get to see the US world champions. And I'm only 18 years old. Sorry man! You still got American Football and Baseball. And you can still win back basketball from us Europeans.
2006-10-01 11:50:12 · answer #4 · answered by lx_english17 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probaly because you ask daft question like this and don't understand the game of football. The Americans did play int he world cup they had the same amount of players as everyone else. i think you need to go back to your happy bubble and go back to forgetting what goes on in the rest of the world!
2006-10-01 11:02:37 · answer #5 · answered by Andy C 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was just the one American team(USA) playing in the World Cup.
They can only win if they score more goals than their opponents.
I don't really understand your question.
2006-10-01 10:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i really dont get ur question.
do you want the US team to have a larger squad than anyone else? thats not fair.
maybe they would win the world cup if they had 15 padded men who could use their hands on the football pitch.
2006-10-01 10:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
America was in the WC and played Italy.
They taunted the poor honourable Italians that had to show honour by honourably attacking them and honourably getting red cards and honourably getting suspended from important games.
2006-10-01 11:34:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, but Come On Argentina!
2006-10-01 11:02:05 · answer #9 · answered by Juan Ignacio 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Have they invented new rules that says the USA can play by their own rules?
2006-10-01 10:59:29 · answer #10 · answered by psychoticgenius 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋