English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Has there been any evidence of any new species developed from a previous existing species in the last three hundred years?

Living organism, not viruses. Naturally occuring, not "tinkered with" by humans. References?

Please do not rant on the merits of the scientific theory of "Evolution." This is not a slam on "Evolution." This is a serious request about scientific data, nothing more.

2006-10-01 03:27:31 · 13 answers · asked by Richard 7 in Science & Mathematics Biology

I do not mean found as in humanity just got around to cataloging them. I mean like they were not here before and now they are here. Newly developed.

2006-10-01 03:58:34 · update #1

13 answers

Actually, yes hundreds if not thousands have been discovered in the past 300 years. You have to consider the fact that we are just now begining to skim the surface of the life that exists in the ocean. And there are yet thousands yet undiscovered.

2006-10-01 03:32:30 · answer #1 · answered by David B 2 · 10 2

It sounds like your answer is a disguised way of saying, "have scientists ever witnessed evolution?" The answer would be no, nobody has ever seen a species evolve. The reason is that evolution occurs over millions of years as a result of environmental pressures, not a mere 300 years.

If we could accelerate time and fit several million years into 300 years in order to witness a new species evolve from an existing species, the event would probably only take minutes. Birds, a species most likely descended from dinosaurs, may very well be evolving into a new species as we speak, but we will have to watch them for a few million more years to see what exactly they are becoming. Mankind has only been here for a few moments of the period of time in which birds have been evolving.

Scientists can INFER what you are asking by examining the fossil record. There are fabulous examples of intermediary species, such as Archeopteryx, which was part lizard and part bird.

FYI - viruses are alive, do occur naturally, and evolve without human tinkering all the time. The reason we can see this is because the life cycle of viruses is orders of magnitude faster than animals

2006-10-04 09:21:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

finally somebody who has a similar component as me! there is not any genuine way that a inhabitants of 30K species might only simultaniously multilply via 50! this might particularly for sure take time to do, only as the rest in the international. i understand that God works wonders, in spite of the undeniable fact that it style of feels unrealistic to think of that this would have got here approximately without transformations, mutations, diversifications, and finally finished new branches of animals being shaped. My component is, the present would desire to not be the way it quite is on the instant without the previous, however the previous became not something alike now frequently because of the fact issues hadn't had of project to evolve yet. i'm Christian, yet i've got faith that Evolution has obvious validity to it. It would not take a rocket scientist to comprhehend the concept efficiently. If we did evolve from apes, it is a probability, then i don't have a situation with that. we are the "head" subspecies in a international teaming with wild-existence... Why would desire to be be so pissed off or ashamed approximately being distantly with regards to between the main inteligent animals in the international? faith isn't purely faith, it quite is a dire accesory to the planet we proceed to exist, and the failings that we do and say daily.

2016-10-18 07:24:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Your question is impossible to answer. Even if it looks like a new species, there is no way to tell with 100% certainty that it did or did not exist 300 years ago. I wouldn't be surprised if 99.9% of all the new species discovered in the last 300 years already existed.1,000 years ago. even those that are discovered in our own backyard.

2006-10-01 03:53:27 · answer #4 · answered by escaped_mental_case 4 · 0 2

Yes actually thousands have been found I mean we are talking about 300 years that's a long time and yes I looked it up it's correct

2006-10-07 14:56:26 · answer #5 · answered by GirlyGirl 1 · 1 0

Don't you ever watch Animal Planet? Scientists are finding new species all the time, mostly in the rain forest.

2006-10-01 03:31:24 · answer #6 · answered by rebecca_sld 4 · 1 0

I am sure there have been since many new animals are added to the list. if you go the human way some dumbass decided to cross breed many wild creature. but in nature I am sure there have been some who have evolved from there original state.

2006-10-01 03:32:22 · answer #7 · answered by bluedanube69 5 · 1 0

Here's a couple of links that I found.
All new species of plants, animals, etc.
The second one I think is the coolest.

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060930-091501-6765r

http://www.dispatch.com/science/science.php?story=dispatch/2006/09/26/20060926-D6-05.html

2006-10-01 03:34:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes there was recently a dicovery of meany new species of fish.

2006-10-01 03:36:04 · answer #9 · answered by SUPERSTAR X 4 · 1 0

Here's some links and data on new speciation:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

2006-10-01 03:31:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers