please answer a brief survey on circumcision?

Question

Have you had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners?

Which do you prefer?

Why?

How did intercourse feel different?

would/did u circumcise your boy

Answer 1

Both-no difference, and no, I would not mutilate my child in this way.

Answer 2

I have had a circumcised and uncircumcised partner. I'm not too awful experienced but I think I like it better with the one who isn't. Could be the way he uses it though. :) I'm not sure what in particular made the intercourse better. Like I said, maybe he just knows how to do it better than the other guy. I am having a baby boy born here in a few weeks or so and I am not getting it done. Simply because his father isn't circumcised and I don't see any reason why my son should be different; also because I did speak with our pediatrician and he said there is no medical reason why it should be done and as long as you keep him clean and teach him how to take care of the fold that he will be fine. I don't want to make my baby hurt and I don't like the risk of infection from the healing process either.

Answer 3

I have two sons and both where circumcised just because I had A friend who didn't get her five your old circumcised and he kept getting infections and eventually had to get circumcised when he was five it was A horrible thing to watch him suffer when she could of gotten it done when he was A baby and not even remember the pain I also knew An adult who had to get it done in his twenties so I made sure I got my sons done and they are five and 8 and are just fine.

Answer 4

I have had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners and really makes no difference to me.

I circumcised my 4month old son

Answer 5

i've had both. i don think it feels different. it does look nicer when they are circumcised especially when a man isnt aroused. i had my son circumcised. if you choose to do it, please make an apt as soon as possible my son was ten days old and he had a some what larger penis than usual. so when they put the clamp on him they nearly crushed him. he had a bruise for a month and a half. his pediatrician said that was the norm. (she didnt do it. ) so for his sake if you do it, do it early.

Answer 6

Yes Ive been with both.
No difference to me.
It felt completely the same.
No I did not circumcise my son because its not necessary

Answer 7

only uncircumcised partners by pure choice and yes I would circumcise my male child.

Answer 8

i've had one partner that wasnt and it did feel a little different to me. its difficult to explain though. i prefer that they are and if and when i have a boy (expecting twins) he will DEFINITELY be circumcised. it's just an ugly lil thing! lol

Answer 9

I definently circumcised my baby boy.....the doctors recommend because it is so much cleaner and "most" boys are so why make them different from the guys who they have to be around....the kids can be so cruel these days why do that to your child?

~they are way more pros than cons on doing it!~

Answer 10

Ive seen both, but have only had sex with my husband who is circumsized.

Iam revolted by penis' anyway, and an untrimmed one is just revolting.

Our son is due and January, and his circumcision is already planned.

Answer 11

They prefer circumcised, because they are freaks of nature!

The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html