The baby had the heart disease. Had it been the mother, one might rewrite the sentence in this way:
The woman, who suffered heart disease, had a baby.
The beauty of the English language is that one can always rewrite sentences to avoid unnecessary confusion.
2006-10-01 02:47:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by wheezer_april_4th_1966 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although it's more likely that the baby had a heart disease, since "baby" is closest to the complement "with a heart disease", the sentence may look ambiguous to some.
This kind of sentence should be avoided if the writer values good style.
The sentence could be rewritten as follows:
The baby she had/Her baby was afflicted by a heart disease.
Take care!
2006-10-01 02:49:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems pretty obvious from the statement that the "baby has a heart disease".
If you break this up..
She had a baby ----> with a heart disease.
2006-10-01 02:49:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate when people do that!
I would say the baby had the heart disease.
2006-10-01 02:46:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by J13891 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say that the baby had a heart disease.
2006-10-01 02:41:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by malteser*_* 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know. It's so funny when people do that. I even see it in books, and hear it on the news. I think what they mean is that the baby had heart disease.
2006-10-01 02:41:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The baby.The baby with a heart disease means it's the baby.Otherwise it would be ,With a heart disease she had a baby.
2006-10-01 02:47:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by mary 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The baby
2006-10-01 02:42:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kevin F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well when u say she, then the baby has a heart disease, beacause look at the word with, if with comes before the subject then that is the word being described
2006-10-01 02:42:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by -*B*-Radicalll 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the baby she had,had heart disease.not the mother.
2006-10-01 02:48:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by tonima 4
·
0⤊
0⤋