birds - no music. so eerie.
2006-09-30 21:18:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by pookie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Rope. Its genuine massive for the style of effortless plot and ecosystem, No massive creation or tricky plot, only a desirable personality study with a small solid and the full movie virtually takes concern in the equivalent room, yet is gripping from setting up to end. in simple terms at the moment offered the particular Ed Blu Ray container-set and fairly taking section in observing his classics after this kind of lengthy time period. Frenzy is excellent in HD...
2016-12-04 02:18:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i loved "spellbound" because i thought it was a wonderful cross between funny, sexy and suspenseful. the acting done in that era was so much more REAL....i love the fact that everything about those characters is believable, down to their body language. nothing is contrived. i think this has something to do with the lack of special effects and thus, the actors need to really ACT.
2006-09-30 21:41:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by echolily 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Notorious [1946]
2006-10-01 02:26:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jubei 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Undoubtedly "Psycho".
It was shot in B&W but still because of its amazing direction and superlative performances, it managed to hold the viewers interest.It was way better than its remake.
Already watched it five times.
2006-09-30 21:16:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Psycho, because at the time it was very very scarry!
& The Mummy helped !!
& the shower & the spooky music
2006-09-30 22:19:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I loved them all because they kept me glued to the tube.
2006-09-30 21:32:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by //////////////// 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked "Birds", it's so thrilling. I liked the actors too.
2006-10-01 01:09:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mondschein! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
None
2006-10-01 01:40:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Strangers on a train, because i said.
2006-09-30 21:17:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋