The question asked is pertaining to two different planes. One plane where time is considered, aging is taken into consideration. In the other plane, these parameters do not exist as the mind which analises is an illusion too.
2006-10-01 05:12:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by No Saint 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Time may be ELUSIVE, but it is NOT an illusion, which is probably why the illusions people use trying to reverse the aging process don't work very well!
2006-09-30 20:41:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by DangerMom 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi,
There are various ways in which time been argued to be an "illusion".
One example is the "4 Dimensionalism" argument. Popularized by Einstein and other physicists, the 4 dimensional viewpoint regards all of the "space-time continuum" to be one large "block" of reality, containing all past, present and future events. Our lives are tracings of "world lines" within this 4 dimensional reality. Under this paradigm, the human experience of time may be considered highly subjective and in many respects an "illusion".
Here is a good article outlining this argument:
http://www.nd.edu/~mrea/Online%20Papers/Four%20Dimensionalism.pdf
Also, here is a recent post of mine where I present a similar point of view, which argues that the "forward direction of time" is an illusion:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AukW1ugdyFHMlaj0.Ah8LuXsy6IX?qid=20060930221050AAXplyW
These types of theories assert is that our "aging self" exists as a complete 4 dimensional "object", which implies that our commonsense experience of time is an illusion.
Nevertheless, they do not contradict the aging process. Our younger or older versions of ourselves simply exist as different points on our "world lines" within 4 dimensional reality. With regards to your clue: No, we do not need time, in the sense of those aspects of our experience of time which are an illusion. What we do need is a structure within which a person can be aged.
Hope this answers your question!
Jon
2006-09-30 20:56:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Aging is also an illusion of mind and body
2006-09-30 20:33:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Practical 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
before each little thing no longer all animals fly... maximum birds and insects fly and some mammals can fly yet no longer all animals as your imprecise question shows. Birds are dinosaurs (no longer actually) yet direct descendants of those animals living on the earth tens of millions of years in the past. How did they happen? organic decision and mutation. organic decision works on a technique of what ever is maximum constructive survives and breeds. The offspring of those animals evidently chosen will once again mutate in small recommendations, the perfect will live to inform the tale and breed. Wings or in some cases with the elementary squirrel or monkey aerodynamic structure, got here about by tens of millions of years of mutation in muscle and bone structure. Animals who survived the technique their life to reproduce had a significantly better probability of survival using wings or wing like structures pre-evolution and outlived a lot less mutated breeds. genuinely if i dropped a fowl with wings and a fowl devoid of wings of a tree which one will live to inform the tale?? Now you'll question me how did they get the potential to mutate into wings, properly the answer there is probability... genetics is an danger of repetitive and dominant genes in random codes. right it truly is an social gathering: I easily have 2 joint feet on each and each foot which I inherited from my father, his feet are completely joint together the position as mine are only joint 0.5 way. it really is a mixture of the genes from my moms and dads and a probability mixture has convey about an evolution in my ft. If I marry and characteristic toddlers with someone who does no longer have joint feet the joint of the toe will decrease by generations if that style is a continuing and finally disappear. Now you tell me this... Why on the earth would God layout an animal that may somewhat fly yet nonetheless has wings... The hen is an social gathering of undesirable layout survived by fewer predators as they don't look effortless to eat and further survived by domestication. placed that on your dogmatic pipe and smoke it. Btw, i'm no longer easily and atheist
2016-11-25 20:02:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe time is an illusion.
2006-09-30 20:46:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paley Pale 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
time is contingent on our sun. If thats an illusion then we're all old and losing it
2006-09-30 20:35:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Unconvincable 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
who says that time is an illusion???
2006-09-30 21:45:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by kim_rukawa11 3
·
1⤊
1⤋