im 25, and my friend informed me that we were part of the older generation, and the people who graduated later then us is part of the new Clinton generation. Do you believe this to be true, or do you see a pattern in this? They act different, like what is in it for me, and they do not seem to care about others according to my friend. Yes he hates Clinton.
2006-09-30 18:44:48 · 17 answers · asked by james w 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's not really a generation it's just the people with no moral responsibility for their actions.
2006-09-30 18:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by josh m 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well I consider myself part of the Reagan generation, because he was inagurated in 1981 and I graduated HS in 1987, while he was still President. Clinton also served two terms, just like Reagan. So, depending on the timing of your HS life, that probably might cover the "Clinton Generation".
2006-09-30 18:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by Fun and Games 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was only 15 when Clinton got into office and now I'm almost 31. I feel like I was part of that generation, but I definitely am a conservative now.
2006-09-30 18:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A web search turns up nothing by that name. There are many people that are a bit off-in-the-head over their hatred of Clinton. A lot of money went into fueling their animosity. See my link.
His greatest sin was in being a popular Democrat president with very strong communication skills.
2006-09-30 18:56:41 · answer #4 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have heard of the "me" generation... that may be what you're talking about... but Republicans are probably trying to make it clinton's fault... typical...
personally, I think it's a reaction to 9-11.. you see so much horror and destruction... and such a loss of security and safety as a nation... I think some people just went into a "me" mode, especially younger people... and shut down their emotions and just do whatever felt good, because they were scared and tired of hurting...
it's understandable... but I think they will come out of it and hopefully accept the challenges the future gives us all...
2006-09-30 18:52:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All i will say that i was much better off when clinton was in office. I pay the same bills know that i did then and with the same job and cost of living raises I have less money left over in my pocket after the bills are paid and the car is filled with gas. What i am saying is that i was better off with Bill Clinton as president than the liar George Bush. My oppinon
2006-09-30 18:50:39 · answer #6 · answered by Butz 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That makes no one special. Every generation thinks the ones before it are stupid and the one behind it are brats. I assume your friend means that the generation behind you went through their childhood during the 1990's.
I guess that makes you something like the Reagan generation.
****************************
fathead -
Don't you mean the times when their parents had lots of money and the whole world admired and respected America because of Clinton's leadership.
Funny, I don't recall the the blood of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of innocent humans on a dress or anywhere else.
Maybe you should see a sex therapist about you fascination with Clinton's precious bodily fluids and where they end up.
2006-09-30 18:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
How insulting to be called part of a adulterous, lying president generation. I would insist on being called something else. A certain generation needs to be named after someone who isn't so controversial. Like baby boomer.
2006-09-30 18:47:21 · answer #8 · answered by Trollhair 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
never heard of the 'clinton generation'.
2006-09-30 18:45:57 · answer #9 · answered by J K 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is mean - Clinton generation - they have nothing but bullshit in you brain
2006-09-30 19:22:02 · answer #10 · answered by Freesia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋