English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. They're too partisan to acknowledge the fact?
2. That would go against their nature as their version of being an American?
3. To be a real American would be to oppose the Republicans no matter how well their policies work?
4. THE REAL THREAT IS President BUSH and his Administration, not terrorism?
5. There is no war on terror (Islamo Fascists); it's all made up?
6. President BUSH planned all of this before getting into office (even tho he is the dumbest man alive)?
7. Liberals can't appreciate the safety of America unless they're in power?
8. WWWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
9. IT'S NOT FAIR!
10. Everyone know's the Republicans are collaborating with the terrorists to stay in power?

2006-09-30 17:35:11 · 17 answers · asked by Search4truth 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

17 answers

Multiple choice! Yay! XD

#1. Definitely is partly to blame.

#3, if you mean that's what they think.

#7. Is another reason, if you're talking about politicians and bigwigs. There wouldn't be such a smear job against a *liberal* in power.

I would use the word 'safer' instead of safe, because even with Mr. Bush's policies, we'll never be 100% safe.

2006-09-30 17:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by Jennifer Z 3 · 0 0

possibly reason we weren't in any authentic probability contained in the first position. absolute self belief 9/11 got here about all proper and devastated us, yet what got here about afterwards has devastated us, too. If Bin weighted down and Al-Qaeda were those to blame, then how come we finally end up allowing them to bypass at the same time as they are trapped contained in the mountains of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border at the same time as we stumble on reason to attack Iraq? That component not in any respect made any sense to me. we are contained in the course of a Republican president and congress that is conscious no bounds in economic duty. In that regards, it would not count if you're a Republican or Democrat. i'm no longer as waiting as you to purchase into that secure for 5 yrs. business enterprise as you position it because of Bush. lets've honestly been as secure with Gore. Then there are the previous 2 presidential elections that were hair close, yet Bush has run his administration like it owns complete help of the yank human beings. no longer to teach the allegations popping out that the digital balloting machines were rigged by skill of malicious application (already testified in Congress). you ought to get your information instantly and then possibly you'd be agreeing on the quite a few factors that you listed.

2016-11-25 19:53:19 · answer #2 · answered by rosenberg 4 · 0 0

But at what cost? Our liberties.

I'm not a liberal. I think the liberals are just as worthless as conservatives, myself. All worthless. It's the horrible leadership of both these groups over the years that have gotten us to the point we're at now.

Anyways, you keep quivering in your boots everytime you hear the word "terrorist". You keep on being terrified for your life. Personally, I don't play that game. If you think you're safe, you're a fool. You can never be safe from random acts of violence. Myself, I feel more afraid of getting hit by a car then of being killed by terrorists.

"What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
-Patrick Henry

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your council, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
-Samuel Adams

"They that would give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin

For some reason I doubt any of these men would be huge Bush fans.

2006-09-30 17:57:09 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Bojangles 5 · 0 1

Liberals can't let go of the fact, that they lost in 2000. It wouldn't matter who the president was today. If he was a republican, he would be wrong. Don't get me wrong I don't place all Democrats in this area. Many Dem's are fed up with the Libs ways too. Liberals are just as happy to see America fail as those who wish to see us all dead (terrorists). All the liberals I have seen are nothing more than traitors to their country, and should be treated as such. If you don't like what I say to bad. It is very wrong to more respect for the people who wish to see you killed then then for the ones who are trying to protect you. Clinton never kept us safe the time he was in office. It was during his term that we were attacked several times. The USS Cole and the first bombing of the World Trade Centers to mention a few. Bin Laden was offered to him several times and he blew it both times. Blowing up baby aspirn factories, is not protecting America.

2006-09-30 17:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by imasurefire 2 · 0 1

Average time between major terror attacks in the US is 7 years. I am grateful he hasn't screwed up the average.

His policies have done nothing except revoke some of the freedoms he claims that they hate us for.

I'm sure that the reservists in Iraq feel sooooo much safer now.

2006-09-30 17:41:33 · answer #5 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 1 1

Boy you seem able to argue both sides of the case yourself so why but in...you answer yourself with point 4.
why can't the neocons see a broader world view that is fair to all.

2006-09-30 17:52:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush is a class A retard. why did he invade iraq? The country hated bin laden and had nothing to do with him or wmd. Now we are in a country that cant defend itself, and we cant leave. Imagine if we left iraq and brought our troops home, I bet iran would be the first to invade and annex it for its oil wealth. What has this so called president gotten us into?

2006-09-30 17:42:14 · answer #7 · answered by trader4578 4 · 1 1

Ummm...because we know better than to think that that monkey of president is actually doing anything useful...

Just watch the 12 minutes of him sitting there reading that book after the towers were attacked....then you might understand.

2006-09-30 17:44:11 · answer #8 · answered by TheIndianaZephyr 2 · 2 0

Why can't CONSERVATIVES appreciate the fact that Clinton kept us safe for 8 years?

How come no one bombed/drove airplanes into buildings when he was in office? How come gas was so much cheaper back then? How come the world was so much better?

Why are conservatives narrowminded, self-righteous morons who turn everything good into crap?

2006-09-30 17:41:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

uh... why can't conservatives appreciate that Clinton's policies kept us safe for 8 years?

probably the same reasons...

but to be real for a second... when he goes after bin Laden... he can have all the credit... but right now, he's pulling a Clinton... "Osama's not a big threat"... we all know how that worked out for us...

2006-09-30 17:45:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers