English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-30 16:55:10 · 10 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

before or after he lost his marbles?

2006-09-30 16:57:17 · answer #1 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1 1

Ronald Reagan never used the word "Terrorist" in his 90 odd years. He was shot at and miraculously healed... Gee - didn't the Bible tell us about a man that was the Anti-Christ that would be shot and miraculously be healed?

Ronald (I don't recall) Reagan was soft everywhere, especially in the brain.

We, in California, have him to blame for leaglizing abortion when he signed the bill as governor of our once great state.

2006-09-30 17:00:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Shoot no, no way 'The Man' was soft on terror... he did everything he could to support it.

He was instrumental in establishing training camps for them in Afghanistan, and making certain they had plenty of weapons and lots of money.

He fed both sides in the Iran-Iraq war, although he was particularly close to Saddam Hussein (Hussein still considers Reagan a great friend - and who was President when Rummy was having kissy-face photo shoots with Hussein?).

And the illegal arms-money business with Iran and some central America terrorists.

I hate it when people call Reagan soft, and I'll fight anyone who says 'The Man' did not have the terrorists backs 110%.


*****************************
chaosjones7 -

You mean Mohammar, don't you.

ROTFLMAO

***********************************

Locutus -

Although Reagan did kill his 3-yr-old son, he missed Qaddafi. The recent stand-down by Lybia was accomplished through negotiation between Lybia and western Europe (that began with secret talks inititated by the clinton administration in 1999).

2006-09-30 17:07:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

we monkey libs were deeply saddend to learn that clinton (our god) let bin Mr bad man go We saw him on TV cry like a little gril and lie Mr Reagan was a real man not like crybaby clinton (our god)
No Mr Reagan was not soft at least not scared like our god clinton

2006-09-30 17:03:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Like Carter, he did not offer a proper response to Iran's treachery and terrorist actions.... He was not as soft as Carter.... but he should have bombed Iran into rubble after the Marine barracks bombing.... he spoke softly, carried a big stick... but didn't use it as effectively as he should have.... BUT, Carter's wimpy ineffective response to Iran's terrorism was as repulsive as a politician can possibly be.

2006-09-30 17:01:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you mean bailing out of lebanon the day after the marine barracks was blown up by terrorists?....huh....sounds like cut-n-run

2006-09-30 17:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by bush-deathgrip 1 · 1 0

He pretty much shut down Quadaffi.

2006-09-30 17:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

More vague on the concept

2006-09-30 16:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well he bombed Libya so ask Omar

2006-09-30 17:03:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

was JFK or Tip O'Neil?

2006-09-30 16:59:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers