"State of Denial, Bush at War, Part III"
Bob Woodward
No way any of you have read this yet, but I'm surprised that the
Neo-Cons aren't out there whining!!
Cat got yer tongue? Or the truth?
2006-09-30 15:58:17 · 16 answers · asked by culpstir 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
This is a new book released two days ahead of schedule. By Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, "All the Presidents Men", Watergate reporter, etc.
Didn't take long to get a thumbs down though (8 min.). Reactionary much.
Watch "Meet the Press" and "60 Minutes" tomorrow. Better yet, turn on CNN Now!
2006-09-30 16:09:17 · update #1
To: proud_2ba... Cowards die a million deaths.
2006-10-02 04:28:38 · update #2
Many of you are having problems understanding this question. Here it is.
The book mentioned above is about George Bush's handling of the war in Iraq.
It includes information about some of the inner workings of Bush's administration.
My question is,"Where are all the Bush supporters that are usually complaining about this type of book.
Because this question was written three days ago, it has lost some of it's relevence.
This story has been ALL OVER the news, both print and electronic media (see above). Some of these reponders have had no problem understanding what this is about. I really don't understand how folks are missing this unless they are just not paying attention, which is okay (and understandable).
2006-10-02 23:14:54 · update #3
MY biggest fear is that people are becoming complacent to the bush atrocitie's,that they have heard so many negative report's, that another just don't bother them anymore....This happened in the reagan year's,people just seemed,after a time, to not care anymore,which is a very dangerous attitude to take,in that our america,
2006-10-08 06:10:59 · answer #1 · answered by james k 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So you removed the other thread eh?? You know, the one where you refer to idiots and neo-con-bozos... well, here is what I had prepared to post there...
Well, I guess I could be considered a "Bushie" since I choose to support *our* Commander in Chief during a time of War. Who is it you choose to support, our President and the office he holds or those who will do anything to undermine our President and the office he holds? Furthermore, I am no idiot. I am also not a "neo-con-bozo". I am a Democrat and have been supporting the Democrat platform for the last 25 years. I think I have only voted for one Republican in all of that time. How many elections have you taken part in? My voting habits will definitely change though. I can no longer support a party that willfully tries to undermine our President and jeopardizes our country in a time of war.
Bob Woodwards book? Alright, there have been three that he wrote in regards to the Bush Administrations actions in the War on Terror. The first two, “Bush at War” and “Plan of Attack,” portrayed a president firmly in command and a loyal, well-run team responding to a surprise attack and the retaliation that followed. Now this third book, “State of Denial” follows a very different storyline, of an administration that seemed to have only a foggy notion that early military success in Iraq had given way to resentment of the occupiers. The third book contradicts the first two. Which books are we to believe? Do we discount the first two because we choose to believe number three?
Go back to Rome? Something tells me you would need to get Mommy and Daddy's permission first.
*LOL* Coward? And you are wishing a million deaths upon me? Been there and done that and I'm not scared.
I see you couldn't be troubled to answer my questions. Why is that? Did I hit a nerve? I'm sorry for the boo-boo. Go have mommy give it a kiss for ya.
2006-10-02 08:12:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't think a Liberal should be calling Conservatives the whiners. We are the ones that have to listen to people out there whine and complain about Bush 24/7.
2006-09-30 23:02:12 · answer #3 · answered by Luekas 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
It's hitting the fan right now. They are in a state of shock because his earlier books were quite flattering to Bush. Also The Wash Post has a cover story about how Bush used Colin Powell and destroyed his good name. Stay tuned for more.
2006-09-30 23:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If the book was as flattering as the first two, every right wringer would be pointing and saying,"see we told you so." Since it isn't they are just hoping the American people can't read and the book melts into the night.
2006-10-08 13:27:18 · answer #5 · answered by firewomen 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What the Hey! are you talkin' about, tough guy?
I don't watch the Commie News Network. Sorry, champ. I'll take a pass on the propaganda.
2006-09-30 23:01:00 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Since the President's staff have not been quite on this subject, it appears that you may not be as well informed as you suppose.
2006-09-30 23:17:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No one has said anything because no one knows what your talking about including you!
2006-09-30 23:02:20 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Haven't seen it yet--too busy laughing over the Clinton interview with Chris Wallace. (hey---you get that smirk off YOUR face!!) Let us know when you figure your heroes legacy.
2006-09-30 23:04:12 · answer #9 · answered by klarf 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bob just isn't worth the effort....
2006-09-30 23:17:37 · answer #10 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋